By Jim Spencer
SpencerSpeaks.com
Arapahoe County Republican Barbara Fruitman wanted to know where to go for her local presidential caucus Feb. 5. So the Centennial woman went where it made sense – to her party’s local website.
The website instructed Fruitman to use a “precinct finder†to figure out where to caucus. Fruitman typed in her address, including the fact that she lived on a “Place,†not a street. “We could not find that address,†the website told her. “Tip: Try typing just the beginniâ€.
The rest of the message on that line was obliterated by a rail of GOP “Quick Links,†none of which could tell Fruitman where to caucus.
If she typed in just the name of the street she lived on, but not “Place,†she could get a response from the computer. Sadly, it referred her to a precinct number that didn’t exist on the list of precinct and caucus locations listed on the website.
Fruitman is tenacious. She’d prefer to see a single national primary on the same day, since she thinks Iowans and folks from
Frutiman’s experience hints at logistical problems that could haunt the biggest political caucuses in
Officials from both parties insist they have planned for an unprecedented crush of people. Some are even inviting it. Barack Obama’s campaign is on the radio asking registered Democrats to come to the Feb. 5 statewide caucuses that will choose delegates for county assemblies in March. The candidate himself came to
If appearances by Bill Clinton and Obama, who drew morethan 15,000 to his speech, don’t fill the Democrats’ caucus seats, nothing will.
El Paso County Republicans, meanwhile, are running radio ads and sending direct mail to get people to caucus sites in record numbers.
“That’s one thing we’re doing which we’ve never done,†said El Paso GOP executive director Nathan Fisk. “We’re telling people this is where their voices can be heard. We hope to exceed 7,000 (caucus-goers in the county).â€
He may get his wish and then some. Interest in this open presidential election tops most presidential elections in modern memory. Record turnouts in Iowa’s caucuses for both parties and South Carolina’s record turnout for last Saturday’s Democratic primary portend amazing crowds in the 22 states set to express presidential preferences next Tuesday.
In Democratic strongholds such as
“We knew we were going to get hugely larger numbers than ever before,†said Susan Boucher, an office manager with the Boulder County Democrats. “We’ve gone through extensive training for precinct leaders.â€
Those leaders must direct and record hand-raising votes for president – no secret ballots allowed. Then, caucus leaders must commit delegates to the county assembly for candidates who get at least 15 percent of the total while allowing those supporting candidates who get less than 15 percent to either commit to a candidate who did get 15 percent or remain uncommitted.
Got it?
Me neither.
What’s brewing could be a logistical nightmare based on numbers alone. Toss in the fact that many people might have missed the memo that you had to be reigstered foryour respective party by Dec. 5, 2007 in order to be eleigible to participate, along with a few speeches in favor of particular candidates and the expected discussion of impeaching George W. Bush at some Democratic caucuses and you’ve got yourself an agenda that might strain the
“We did the best we could to get the word out,” said state Democratic chairwoman Pat Waak.
The word is this: Arrive early. Those in line at 7 p.m. who are properly registered are supposed to get a chance to participate.
“We may have to pay extra to the custodians†at some school sites in
But with state coordinators at each of the 44
For both parties, it will certainly be first things first. And the first thing everyone cares about is the presidency.
Fisk said his protocol requires a secret-ballot straw poll for Republican presidential hopefuls right out of the blocks.
“The first thing we’ll do is elect a chairman for each caucus. Then a teller committee will distribute ballots for the straw poll. Then surrogates for the different presidential candidates will speak. We believe we’ll have plenty of time to do this in an hour or an hour and a half. If it takes longer because there are so many people, that’s a good problem.â€
The goal for Republicans around the state is to have all results of the presidential straw polls phoned into state GOP headquarters by
That could prove a tall order if crowds get too big. But Fisk said his party has been conducting “extensive training for two and a half months.â€
Unlike Democrats, Republicans will not be conducting a U.S. Senate preference poll at their caucuses.
Democrats, meanwhile, seem to face a more encumbered caucus process and a few more opportunities for controversy.
Like the Republicans, Democrats will determine and report presidential preferences first. Then, they’ll do a Senate preference poll to select between Rep. Mark Udall and state central committee member Mark Benner, a progressive candidate. Finally, it will be on to issues. In
Boucher says interest is so high in
“Observers understand that if we reach fire marshal restriction levels, they will be asked to leave,†Boucher said. “How many caucuses have you heard of where people want to come just to watch?â€
Not many.
It all adds up to an interesting, important and logistically challenging evening.
Barbara Fruitman hopes to participate.
Now that she’s figured out where to go.
Copyright 2008 by Jim Spencer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.




5 users commented in " Caucus Crush Challenges Both Parties "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackHaving just gone on the Colorado Democratic Committee website last night, the process of finding my caucus site couldn’t have been easier! There were also handy materials explaining what to expect at the caucus. I’m in my 50’s, have never been to a caucus, and can’t wait to experience it. Living in one of the most politically active neighborhoods of Denver, I’m expecting a “crush” so I’m arriving early to wait in line (like my old concert-going days!).
This is the first election that I can remember where voters in Colorado have an opportunity to have some small say in who will be the Republican or Democratic nominee for president. In past years, the nominee was determined long before our votes could matter. Unfortunately, however, I cannot vote for my earlier choice, Bill Richardson, or others who better represented my point of view, because they have already dropped out of the race. I still vote, even though I don’t believe my vote can make any real difference, especially when my vote gets erased by the antiquated Electoral College, if my vote is counted at all, which there is not much reason to believe that it will. By the end of the next president’s term, corporations will still control the government and our troops will still be mired in Iraq and Afghanistan and probably in Iran, an endless war which will continue to enrich many of the controlling corporations while spreading death and misery. We are still a long way from “government by the people.”
I don’t believe my vote has ever counted in this state’s presidential election either.
My husband got the call for his Dem caucus place today, finally. He asked if someone not a registered Dem could observe, the guy said something to the effect “we would make it hard for ‘em to get in”..(although I have been of the understanding observation was o.k. unless it was crowded)
I guess I won’t bother then, although I’m sure I have been as good of a democrat as anyone over the years, I’ve always voted dem, and I supported Kerry last time as a matter of life and death (for our soldiers and for our country)..I pressed “send” quite a lot of times for Gov. Dean as part of his online donor committee in 04 and 06 as the dems tried desperately to match the Bushites tit for tat. Sure, I could have given up my status as an independent by Dec. 5th, but the Dems running around the country campaigning instead of continuing to try to end the war left me no desire to do so. I understand New Hampshire and Calif. allow independents to vote, sounds great, although I understand why parties might not want to allow them to.
So I’ll wait it out while the good ‘ol boy clubs play their games and vote for the remnants as I always do.
[…] Jim Spencer wrote an interesting post today on Caucus Crush Challenges Both PartiesHere’s a quick excerptShe’d prefer to see a single national primary on the same day, since she thinks Iowans and folks from New Hampshire don’t know better than the rest of us who’s presidential material. That said, she plays the hand she’s dealt. … […]
My wife has asked me to drive her the 18 miles to her caucus in Cotopaxi. I plan to take a book since the Dems have made it clear on their website only registered Dems will be allowed in.
Wildflower is right about the purpose of a caucus; theoretically this how a party picks their best candidate for the rifraff to vote for the following November. The caucus system was a method of keeping the party bosses/elites in charge.
A primary election using “fixed” voting machines would be a much better system. :]