By Jim Spencer
SpencerSpeaks.com
Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter’s first State of the State speech was about dreams. His second was about reality.
In comparison to the bold vision he showed in 2007, Ritter offered caution in Thursday’s speech to a joint session of the General Assembly. In some ways, it reflected the lessons learned in his first year in office. But it still felt like a call to keep expectations low.
The most glaring example came on the issue of health care reform, perhaps the most important issue facing Americans today.
Here’s what Ritter said about health care reform in 2007:
“My long-term vision is to establish a Colorado Health Plan that provides every Coloradan with access to some basic form of health insurance and health care by 2010.â€
Here’s what Ritter said about health care reform in 2008:
“We have to keep addressing that, and we have to keep doing it in a way that acknowledges the fiscal constraints of this state … We have we have to take a realistic, building-block, steady approach to progress.â€
That sure doesn’t sound like universal health coverage by 2010.
On other critical fronts, such as the need for “21st century transportation,†decently funded colleges and universities and kindergarten-through-high school programs that produce competent graduates and cut shameful dropout rates, the governor was also a lot more restrained than last year.
In 2007, he proclaimed goals of cutting the dropout rate in half in 10 years and halving the achievement gap between white and minority students in a decade. He also touted a study commission that would develop a transportation plan to meet a crying need for road construction and repairs and mass transit.
This year, he warned, “… we aren’t going to come up with big fixes in all of those areas all at once. It would be a fool’s errand even to try. We must make steady progress across the board, doing what is right and what we can afford.â€
The Democratic governor begged for “collaboration†from a Democrat-dominated legislature and a Republican minority already crying foul about a property tax stabilization plan that has added enough money to the state budget to fund expanded pre-school and kindergarten programs.
“We must never mistake sound bites for sound public policy,†the governor said.
With many members of the legislature facing re-election in this presidential election year, it would be a fool’s errand to expect anything except partisan political grandstanding.
But Ritter is right. The state’s needs exist independent of any individual candidate’s need to remain in office.
“From 2001 to 2006, no other state cut funding to higher education more than
Even on the red meat, bi-partisan issue of improved transportation, the governor acknowledged the difficulty of implementing the recommendations of his blue ribbon transportation commission. The commission called for $1.5 billion in projects funded by ongoing fee and tax increases. This is what it will cost to fix gridlock and deplorable roads that drag down quality of life and, eventually, economic development.
“We can make steady progress this year (on transportation),†Ritter contended. “But how we go forward depends largely on whether we can build a bi-partisan consensus around contentious funding issues.â€
In an election year, it’s hard to see that happening.
But not as hard as it will be to see dreams for a great state dashed.
Copyright 2008 by Jim Spencer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.




3 users commented in " Governor Stresses Reality, Not Dreams "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackThis state has gotten itself in a fiscal mess. Finally the bill is coming due but the Republicans continue to cry for lower taxes and the electorate responds to this simple sound bite without any questioning of its consequences.
It is basic math; repairing highways, funding all levels of education and providing for the protection of the enviornment requires money. Without money, the roads fall apart and mass transit does not get built while our public universites continue there steady decline. Add to this scenario a possible recession and it is easy to understand the approach Gov. Ritter took in his State Of the State speech.
“From 2001 to 2006 no other state cut funding to higher education more than Colorado”.
Let’s see, what political party did the prior governor belong to? I’d be curious to know if the prior governor’s kids had scholarships to Colo. colleges during that time.
And isn’t it that same political party in Washington that is sucking us into a recession? The same party that’s spending trillions on a war that should never have been..the same party that allowed oil to go from $20 a barrel to $100 a barrel.
I don’t blame Ritter for the mess we’re in.
If there is blame, let’s blame Doug Bruce, Bill Owens, the Bush Administration.
Wildflower,
With respect to our state, leaving the “emotional” Republican Party kitandkaboodle broad brush rant out of your rave, what do you propose for our state?
How much will it cost and how much should we raise taxes for?
1. roads
2. More funding for higher education and k-12 3. UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE.
Please break each of them down by projected cost give me an aggregate number (not broken down in slivers so it seems smaller) and leave my bill in my post box. Just jam it down my throat and make me like it…
Rather than a rational discussion about the direction of our state, as our governor wants to guide us, we get this garbage about how Republicans (who are not in charge of the House or the Senate, if you need to be reminded) are sucking us into a recession. Thankfully we have Bill Ritter who wants to move the state forward with out partisanship.
Leave A Reply