<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tancredo&#8217;s Successor Won&#8217;t Be Tommy One-Note</title>
	<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/</link>
	<description>Here are my thoughts; share yours</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: LHKMAN</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-830</link>
		<author>LHKMAN</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-830</guid>
					<description>Hallelujah!  He's leaving.  The Sixth District of Colorado deserves better than it got from Tancredo.  The right-wing of the Republican Party foisted this loser on a lot of decent people.  Before you say a word, Hammond, you're welcome to him.  Remember, this guy didn't even have a majority of the Republicans when he first ran; taking only a plurality among four Republicans in the GOP primary.  Then, he reneged on his pledge to serve only three terms.  We know why he's retiring.  He has secured his Congressional pension and lifetime health care based on all the years he worked in the Civil Service before going to Congress.  What a guy!  He speaks and votes against the very things he makes sure he has for himself.  What a guy!  Tancredo's only legislative achievement in his years in Congress was to get an outhouse in a National Forest in Arizona named as a memorial to a Border patrolman who was killed by illegal immigrants.  What a guy!  We in the Sixth District probably will be represented by another Republican, but we at least know it will not be someone who was told by Karl Rove never to darken the White House doorstep.  At least it may be a mainstream Republican, and if we really are fortunate, it will be a thinking Republican.  Nah, that's probably too much to hope for.  Hallelujah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hallelujah!  He&#8217;s leaving.  The Sixth District of Colorado deserves better than it got from Tancredo.  The right-wing of the Republican Party foisted this loser on a lot of decent people.  Before you say a word, Hammond, you&#8217;re welcome to him.  Remember, this guy didn&#8217;t even have a majority of the Republicans when he first ran; taking only a plurality among four Republicans in the GOP primary.  Then, he reneged on his pledge to serve only three terms.  We know why he&#8217;s retiring.  He has secured his Congressional pension and lifetime health care based on all the years he worked in the Civil Service before going to Congress.  What a guy!  He speaks and votes against the very things he makes sure he has for himself.  What a guy!  Tancredo&#8217;s only legislative achievement in his years in Congress was to get an outhouse in a National Forest in Arizona named as a memorial to a Border patrolman who was killed by illegal immigrants.  What a guy!  We in the Sixth District probably will be represented by another Republican, but we at least know it will not be someone who was told by Karl Rove never to darken the White House doorstep.  At least it may be a mainstream Republican, and if we really are fortunate, it will be a thinking Republican.  Nah, that&#8217;s probably too much to hope for.  Hallelujah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anoldguy1944</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-831</link>
		<author>Anoldguy1944</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 01:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-831</guid>
					<description>"Wiens and Harvey often appear strident and vindictive in their right-wing politics. Both senators look like dividers in a district crying out for unification, not to mention real representation."


Hmmm. Right-wing Republicans appearing to be strident and vindictive? There's a surprise.


When I first lived in metro Denver, I was in Tancredo's district by about 100 yards. More's the pity. Then I moved to Loveland, where my Congressional Representative was Marilyn "Helmet Head" Musgrave, and my state "representative" was Jim "Gays want to have sex with animals" Welker. Imagine my relief upon moving back to metro Denver and finding myself in the 7th Congressional District, where elections are not foregone conclusions!


I echo LHKMan about the Congressional pension, health care, &#38;c. Tancredo may be a nice guy in person, but as a legislator, the only person he's represented for a long time is himself and some genuinely racist lunatics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wiens and Harvey often appear strident and vindictive in their right-wing politics. Both senators look like dividers in a district crying out for unification, not to mention real representation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmmm. Right-wing Republicans appearing to be strident and vindictive? There&#8217;s a surprise.</p>
<p>When I first lived in metro Denver, I was in Tancredo&#8217;s district by about 100 yards. More&#8217;s the pity. Then I moved to Loveland, where my Congressional Representative was Marilyn &#8220;Helmet Head&#8221; Musgrave, and my state &#8220;representative&#8221; was Jim &#8220;Gays want to have sex with animals&#8221; Welker. Imagine my relief upon moving back to metro Denver and finding myself in the 7th Congressional District, where elections are not foregone conclusions!</p>
<p>I echo LHKMan about the Congressional pension, health care, &amp;c. Tancredo may be a nice guy in person, but as a legislator, the only person he&#8217;s represented for a long time is himself and some genuinely racist lunatics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-832</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 01:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-832</guid>
					<description>Where's my freeking valid comments Spencer?
   I don't appreciate being named by cretins
   on you're blog and being Liberal P.C. 
   censored by Spencer the Censor.  I don't
   agree with you most of the time but 
   according to your home page that's ok.
   ha.  Hallelujah!  whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s my freeking valid comments Spencer?<br />
   I don&#8217;t appreciate being named by cretins<br />
   on you&#8217;re blog and being Liberal P.C.<br />
   censored by Spencer the Censor.  I don&#8217;t<br />
   agree with you most of the time but<br />
   according to your home page that&#8217;s ok.<br />
   ha.  Hallelujah!  whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-833</link>
		<author>Deborah</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-833</guid>
					<description>Coffman's the man to beat. You are right: He's a nice guy and even us in-your-face Latino Democrats who defy the odds by living in the 6th Congressional District would agree with that assessment. Plus, he's just more experienced and professional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coffman&#8217;s the man to beat. You are right: He&#8217;s a nice guy and even us in-your-face Latino Democrats who defy the odds by living in the 6th Congressional District would agree with that assessment. Plus, he&#8217;s just more experienced and professional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george_pramenko</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-835</link>
		<author>george_pramenko</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-835</guid>
					<description>Yes, it's a great day for Colorado and for those believing in common sense and believe in "popular, secular, self rule"!  Tancredo has finally realized that he's a "has been".  He's been in that category for a long time now though not willing to admit it.  Now that he's in the minority in the House of Representatives, he's even more of a "no body!"
That pro-militia guy, former state senator Charles Duke(R-Monument) was the one whose political base Tancredo parlayed off of and grabbed onto it sometime back before The tragedies of the Oklahoma City Murrah Fed. Bldg. Bombing...and the Columbine Massacre. "Gun Nuts on the Loose, all of them." With Tancredo, et al, spurring them on!
These fruit cakes are also with Grover Norquist
and his anti-tax reform movement! 

As the disgust with the NRA and the Gun Owners of American,(Duddly Brown) grew, so did the influence wane of these right wing political idiots and lunatics who'd aligned themselves with the Christian Right and Pro-Lifers!  

So much for those who are hypocrits of the Nth Degree who on the one hand encourage anti-government sentiment and promote guns until someone gets hurt...and on the other hand promote "pro-life issues, except for War and the Death Penalty!"  

See Ya Around, Tom!  ~  GP

p.s. Maybe you, Tom, can go back to working for the Independence Institute and be a guest again on that right winger, Mike Rosen's radio talk show on KOA!  (He'd probably like to hear from you...about all your "wonderful accomplishments in Congress.")</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s a great day for Colorado and for those believing in common sense and believe in &#8220;popular, secular, self rule&#8221;!  Tancredo has finally realized that he&#8217;s a &#8220;has been&#8221;.  He&#8217;s been in that category for a long time now though not willing to admit it.  Now that he&#8217;s in the minority in the House of Representatives, he&#8217;s even more of a &#8220;no body!&#8221;<br />
That pro-militia guy, former state senator Charles Duke(R-Monument) was the one whose political base Tancredo parlayed off of and grabbed onto it sometime back before The tragedies of the Oklahoma City Murrah Fed. Bldg. Bombing&#8230;and the Columbine Massacre. &#8220;Gun Nuts on the Loose, all of them.&#8221; With Tancredo, et al, spurring them on!<br />
These fruit cakes are also with Grover Norquist<br />
and his anti-tax reform movement! </p>
<p>As the disgust with the NRA and the Gun Owners of American,(Duddly Brown) grew, so did the influence wane of these right wing political idiots and lunatics who&#8217;d aligned themselves with the Christian Right and Pro-Lifers!  </p>
<p>So much for those who are hypocrits of the Nth Degree who on the one hand encourage anti-government sentiment and promote guns until someone gets hurt&#8230;and on the other hand promote &#8220;pro-life issues, except for War and the Death Penalty!&#8221;  </p>
<p>See Ya Around, Tom!  ~  GP</p>
<p>p.s. Maybe you, Tom, can go back to working for the Independence Institute and be a guest again on that right winger, Mike Rosen&#8217;s radio talk show on KOA!  (He&#8217;d probably like to hear from you&#8230;about all your &#8220;wonderful accomplishments in Congress.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LHKMAN</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-836</link>
		<author>LHKMAN</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-836</guid>
					<description>Dennis: (I hope you don't mind me calling you by your first name.  We have had so many exchanges it just feels right - like we were old friends having a pleasant political discussion - an oxymoron, if ever I've heard of one.)

The news just came out that Bush vetoed the Water Resources Development Act because it had more in it than he wanted.  Funny, but I don't recall seeing the picture of him vetoing the $286 billion highway program two years ago.  That one only had 6,000 earmarks worth $24 billion. Oh, I forgot, the Republicans controlled Congress then, so it obviously wasn't profligate spending, but good government.  Yes, and I'm from the government and I'm here to help you, too.  

Bush will again veto the SCHIP program that provides PRIVATE insurance for children of the working poor.  That's insurance, not socialized medical care, as he and his a**-kissing pals on Capitol Hill keep braying.  In fact, it's the same concept that Mitt Romney, another Republican, instituted in the PRoM - that's People's Republic of Massachusetts.

It becomes increasingly clear that Bush is only the latest Republican hypocrite, and that he doesn't hesitate to make up false reasons for what he does and doesn't do.  We could start with his attempts to tie Iraq to 9/11.  We were no better than Germany was on Sept. 1, 2939, when it cooked up a rationale for invading Poland.  Somehow, it's hard to justify preemptive wars when the stated reason for preemption are not valid.  And what ever happened to Osama bin Laden?  You remember him.  He's the head terrorist we were going to catch in Afghanistan, some six years ago.  Oh, well, what's a little hyperbole among friends, especially when Afghanistan has no oil, but Iraq has a lot of it.  GWB says he would like to negotiate an acceptable version of SCHIP, but his version of negotiate is "my way or the highway."  He has not met with any Democrat Congressional leaders, but he sure looks cute when he says he wants to compromise, doesn't he?

So, we seem to have an administration and obstructionist minority in Congress for whom the truth is a stranger, that is mean-spirited when it comes to providing for American citizens, and considers the public to be too damned stupid to recognize these things.  Yep, Dennis, you're right with your diatribes against crooked politicians and tax-and-spend government.  Only, it's the Republicans - your beloved GOP - who are guilty of those sins.  That's not quite right, of course.  It isn't tax and spend.  It's really don't tax and spend, allowing our grandchildren to pay.  By the way, you do remember that there was a budget surplus and the national debt was being reduced when good ol' George took office.  Now, we have the largest national debt in our national history.  So, how do you like having someone else tell you what the Republicans stand for and believe?  Still think the Republicans have a monopoly on integrity and good government?  Or, is your sense of humor being tested?  I'm having a swell time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis: (I hope you don&#8217;t mind me calling you by your first name.  We have had so many exchanges it just feels right - like we were old friends having a pleasant political discussion - an oxymoron, if ever I&#8217;ve heard of one.)</p>
<p>The news just came out that Bush vetoed the Water Resources Development Act because it had more in it than he wanted.  Funny, but I don&#8217;t recall seeing the picture of him vetoing the $286 billion highway program two years ago.  That one only had 6,000 earmarks worth $24 billion. Oh, I forgot, the Republicans controlled Congress then, so it obviously wasn&#8217;t profligate spending, but good government.  Yes, and I&#8217;m from the government and I&#8217;m here to help you, too.  </p>
<p>Bush will again veto the SCHIP program that provides PRIVATE insurance for children of the working poor.  That&#8217;s insurance, not socialized medical care, as he and his a**-kissing pals on Capitol Hill keep braying.  In fact, it&#8217;s the same concept that Mitt Romney, another Republican, instituted in the PRoM - that&#8217;s People&#8217;s Republic of Massachusetts.</p>
<p>It becomes increasingly clear that Bush is only the latest Republican hypocrite, and that he doesn&#8217;t hesitate to make up false reasons for what he does and doesn&#8217;t do.  We could start with his attempts to tie Iraq to 9/11.  We were no better than Germany was on Sept. 1, 2939, when it cooked up a rationale for invading Poland.  Somehow, it&#8217;s hard to justify preemptive wars when the stated reason for preemption are not valid.  And what ever happened to Osama bin Laden?  You remember him.  He&#8217;s the head terrorist we were going to catch in Afghanistan, some six years ago.  Oh, well, what&#8217;s a little hyperbole among friends, especially when Afghanistan has no oil, but Iraq has a lot of it.  GWB says he would like to negotiate an acceptable version of SCHIP, but his version of negotiate is &#8220;my way or the highway.&#8221;  He has not met with any Democrat Congressional leaders, but he sure looks cute when he says he wants to compromise, doesn&#8217;t he?</p>
<p>So, we seem to have an administration and obstructionist minority in Congress for whom the truth is a stranger, that is mean-spirited when it comes to providing for American citizens, and considers the public to be too damned stupid to recognize these things.  Yep, Dennis, you&#8217;re right with your diatribes against crooked politicians and tax-and-spend government.  Only, it&#8217;s the Republicans - your beloved GOP - who are guilty of those sins.  That&#8217;s not quite right, of course.  It isn&#8217;t tax and spend.  It&#8217;s really don&#8217;t tax and spend, allowing our grandchildren to pay.  By the way, you do remember that there was a budget surplus and the national debt was being reduced when good ol&#8217; George took office.  Now, we have the largest national debt in our national history.  So, how do you like having someone else tell you what the Republicans stand for and believe?  Still think the Republicans have a monopoly on integrity and good government?  Or, is your sense of humor being tested?  I&#8217;m having a swell time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noidea</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-837</link>
		<author>noidea</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-837</guid>
					<description>Hey LHKMAn,

How did you feel when the Iranian fuc.s took over our embassy and held our people hostage for 400 plus days.........are you into their nuclear aspirations? No big deal? What do you think that their ideas are?  Freedom and live and let live?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey LHKMAn,</p>
<p>How did you feel when the Iranian fuc.s took over our embassy and held our people hostage for 400 plus days&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;are you into their nuclear aspirations? No big deal? What do you think that their ideas are?  Freedom and live and let live?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-839</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-839</guid>
					<description>LHKMAN,

   Congress in whole spends too much of our
   money, I agree with that but remember that
   that Budget surplus you're referring to
   resulted from Clintons tax increase and
   a massive cut in defense spending and
   intelligence gathering assets.  Now, you
   might recall were in a war and we enjoyed
   a recession in the early 2000's due to
   the tax increases, just as Bill was 
   leaving office.

   And that is the last contribution I will
   make to a blog that Censors and negates
   peoples comments, ESPECIALLY when they are 
   defended people whose character is being
   attacked.  Like Tancredo's was, very 
   unfairly.  Spencer can sing to the choir,
   dispite his welcoming homepage I think he
   prefers that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LHKMAN,</p>
<p>   Congress in whole spends too much of our<br />
   money, I agree with that but remember that<br />
   that Budget surplus you&#8217;re referring to<br />
   resulted from Clintons tax increase and<br />
   a massive cut in defense spending and<br />
   intelligence gathering assets.  Now, you<br />
   might recall were in a war and we enjoyed<br />
   a recession in the early 2000&#8217;s due to<br />
   the tax increases, just as Bill was<br />
   leaving office.</p>
<p>   And that is the last contribution I will<br />
   make to a blog that Censors and negates<br />
   peoples comments, ESPECIALLY when they are<br />
   defended people whose character is being<br />
   attacked.  Like Tancredo&#8217;s was, very<br />
   unfairly.  Spencer can sing to the choir,<br />
   dispite his welcoming homepage I think he<br />
   prefers that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noidea</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-844</link>
		<author>noidea</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 03:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-844</guid>
					<description>Arnold,

I have never owned a gun, nor fired one.  But I believe in gun ownership and that doesn't make me a freak..  What are you afraid of?

Second of all, look at a ultra sound of a baby at 16 weeks and then criticize the Pro Life stand point......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arnold,</p>
<p>I have never owned a gun, nor fired one.  But I believe in gun ownership and that doesn&#8217;t make me a freak..  What are you afraid of?</p>
<p>Second of all, look at a ultra sound of a baby at 16 weeks and then criticize the Pro Life stand point&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LHKMAN</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-845</link>
		<author>LHKMAN</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 22:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-845</guid>
					<description>Golly, Dennis, you're braying again.  Did you have something censored?  Too bad.  Seriously too bad.  Some of us flaming liberals don't believe in censorship of the right or left, and we can take whatever you dish out.  I trust your version of "valid" comments was a response to my comment, which clearly was aimed at you.  By the way, the word is properly spelled as "freaking", not freeking as you have it.

You don't seem to have nearly the sense of humor you claim when it is you heaping venom on others here.  Ta-ta, old boy.  Don't bust a gut.  This is all in good fun -- or is it only in good fun when you declare it to be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Golly, Dennis, you&#8217;re braying again.  Did you have something censored?  Too bad.  Seriously too bad.  Some of us flaming liberals don&#8217;t believe in censorship of the right or left, and we can take whatever you dish out.  I trust your version of &#8220;valid&#8221; comments was a response to my comment, which clearly was aimed at you.  By the way, the word is properly spelled as &#8220;freaking&#8221;, not freeking as you have it.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t seem to have nearly the sense of humor you claim when it is you heaping venom on others here.  Ta-ta, old boy.  Don&#8217;t bust a gut.  This is all in good fun &#8212; or is it only in good fun when you declare it to be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LHKMAN</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-855</link>
		<author>LHKMAN</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-855</guid>
					<description>What an apt Username, noidea.  You haven't got a clue on much of anything, do you?  What in holy hell has the Iranian hostage taking got to do with Terrible Tommy Tancredo and his much anticipated decision to leave public office, and particularly with my contribution to this thread on the departure of Terrible Tommy?  To give your silly post more credibility and courtesy than it deserves, I'll answer your silly question.  No, I didn't like the Iranian hostage takeover of our embassy, nor am I "into", as you so delicately put it, Iran's nuclear (nucular, as a certain office holder insists on calling it) ambitions.  Nor am I aware that Terrible Tommy Tancredo ever has concerned himself with those issues unless you now are trying to argue that the people crossing the border illegally really are Iranian agents.  Is that it?  Personally, even though it is not the subject of this message stream, I think the Iranians ought to be held accountable for a gross violation of the norms of international behavior.  Even Cuba, Germany and Japan respected the extraterritoriality of foreign embassies.  All civilized nations do.  Ergo, Iran is barbaric and should be treated accordingly.  Now, what was your point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an apt Username, noidea.  You haven&#8217;t got a clue on much of anything, do you?  What in holy hell has the Iranian hostage taking got to do with Terrible Tommy Tancredo and his much anticipated decision to leave public office, and particularly with my contribution to this thread on the departure of Terrible Tommy?  To give your silly post more credibility and courtesy than it deserves, I&#8217;ll answer your silly question.  No, I didn&#8217;t like the Iranian hostage takeover of our embassy, nor am I &#8220;into&#8221;, as you so delicately put it, Iran&#8217;s nuclear (nucular, as a certain office holder insists on calling it) ambitions.  Nor am I aware that Terrible Tommy Tancredo ever has concerned himself with those issues unless you now are trying to argue that the people crossing the border illegally really are Iranian agents.  Is that it?  Personally, even though it is not the subject of this message stream, I think the Iranians ought to be held accountable for a gross violation of the norms of international behavior.  Even Cuba, Germany and Japan respected the extraterritoriality of foreign embassies.  All civilized nations do.  Ergo, Iran is barbaric and should be treated accordingly.  Now, what was your point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildflower</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-862</link>
		<author>Wildflower</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-862</guid>
					<description>Dennis, did it ever occur to you in your rightwing paranoia that perhaps your comments didn't get through to Jim's posting board, after all computers aren't human.  I also posted on Nov. 1st and it didn't get through, I thought it might be a computer glitch,or perhaps I got censored too since my comments were out of line. Get real. My advice is to clean it up and send it again if it bothers you that much.  Mine are never worth reposting anyway. 
 I remember when you were whining that you couldn't buy a Rockies' ticket, as if YOU were the only one who couldn't get through.  My husband spent 6 hrs. in the two days and couldn't get through once.  So did 100,000 other fans.  If you want to complain about something, complain about the poor treatment genuine Rockies fans got, people who wanted to go to the game but couldn't get a ticket, people who are older and might not ever get the chance to see a Rockies playoff game (maybe it'll be 90 yrs.), not people who wanted to sell and make big bucks.  
Quit being so freeking paranoid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, did it ever occur to you in your rightwing paranoia that perhaps your comments didn&#8217;t get through to Jim&#8217;s posting board, after all computers aren&#8217;t human.  I also posted on Nov. 1st and it didn&#8217;t get through, I thought it might be a computer glitch,or perhaps I got censored too since my comments were out of line. Get real. My advice is to clean it up and send it again if it bothers you that much.  Mine are never worth reposting anyway.<br />
 I remember when you were whining that you couldn&#8217;t buy a Rockies&#8217; ticket, as if YOU were the only one who couldn&#8217;t get through.  My husband spent 6 hrs. in the two days and couldn&#8217;t get through once.  So did 100,000 other fans.  If you want to complain about something, complain about the poor treatment genuine Rockies fans got, people who wanted to go to the game but couldn&#8217;t get a ticket, people who are older and might not ever get the chance to see a Rockies playoff game (maybe it&#8217;ll be 90 yrs.), not people who wanted to sell and make big bucks.<br />
Quit being so freeking paranoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-868</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-868</guid>
					<description>Well let's see my good liberal friends
    Wildflower and LHKMAN.  I SAID in response
    to Spencer's Tancredo's successor won't
    be Tommy One note that I admire Tancredo
    for the having the courage of his 
    convictions in addressing a very serious
    issue in this country and that is our
    border security AND the ILLEGAL 
    immigration problem.  We have very FEW
    people in CONGRESS either house who address
    REAL issues.  THIRD rail issues which can
    RUIN a political career.  IMMIGRATION
    has become a RACIAL ISSUE in which the
    race card is constantly played especially
    be people like SPENCER.  I contend that
    SPENCER is a REVERSE RACIST because he
    used race or the issue of race to try 
    to muzzle those who wish to have an open
    debate about various issues which effect
    people of different racial backgrounds
    to different degrees.  Illegal immigration
    has been made into a racial, taboo issue.

    It's not it's simple economics and 
    security.  Tancrdo is not a racist
    though Spencer implies that he is.  Some
    kind of obsessed bigot.  And I claim that
    it's Spencer who is the racist because he
    continually makes it a white on brown 
    issue.  He's what I call a reverse racist
    because he hates his own race, that's just
    as racist as hating someone for being 
    black or brown or green or blue.

    That's what I said.  I have no quams with
    reading ANYTHING anyone says about me
    and LKMAN I DO enjoy the discourse.  But
    if you came to my website you'd see there
    is no censorship of any kind.

    regards
   
    Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well let&#8217;s see my good liberal friends<br />
    Wildflower and LHKMAN.  I SAID in response<br />
    to Spencer&#8217;s Tancredo&#8217;s successor won&#8217;t<br />
    be Tommy One note that I admire Tancredo<br />
    for the having the courage of his<br />
    convictions in addressing a very serious<br />
    issue in this country and that is our<br />
    border security AND the ILLEGAL<br />
    immigration problem.  We have very FEW<br />
    people in CONGRESS either house who address<br />
    REAL issues.  THIRD rail issues which can<br />
    RUIN a political career.  IMMIGRATION<br />
    has become a RACIAL ISSUE in which the<br />
    race card is constantly played especially<br />
    be people like SPENCER.  I contend that<br />
    SPENCER is a REVERSE RACIST because he<br />
    used race or the issue of race to try<br />
    to muzzle those who wish to have an open<br />
    debate about various issues which effect<br />
    people of different racial backgrounds<br />
    to different degrees.  Illegal immigration<br />
    has been made into a racial, taboo issue.</p>
<p>    It&#8217;s not it&#8217;s simple economics and<br />
    security.  Tancrdo is not a racist<br />
    though Spencer implies that he is.  Some<br />
    kind of obsessed bigot.  And I claim that<br />
    it&#8217;s Spencer who is the racist because he<br />
    continually makes it a white on brown<br />
    issue.  He&#8217;s what I call a reverse racist<br />
    because he hates his own race, that&#8217;s just<br />
    as racist as hating someone for being<br />
    black or brown or green or blue.</p>
<p>    That&#8217;s what I said.  I have no quams with<br />
    reading ANYTHING anyone says about me<br />
    and LKMAN I DO enjoy the discourse.  But<br />
    if you came to my website you&#8217;d see there<br />
    is no censorship of any kind.</p>
<p>    regards</p>
<p>    Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-870</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-870</guid>
					<description>By the way Wildflower, when is a complaint
   valid?  If someone has a "beef" it has to
   be whining if you don't agree? I thought
   Liberals were so "in touch" with their 
   fellow man?  If that's the case you should
   "feel my pain"  right?  I think it serves 
   the Rockies right they got swept.  They 
   played AT HOME for a bunch of non 
   Coloradoans who paid ticket brokers big 
   bucks and I'm sure the Rockies took 
   advantage.  I GOT THROUGH on the website
   and got timed out when I was completing 
   my order.  It was rigged and in retro
   spect I'm GLAD I didn't spend $600 on 
   tickets because I would have gone to watch
   them get their butts kicked, like a loyal
   fan.

   Cheers
 
   Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way Wildflower, when is a complaint<br />
   valid?  If someone has a &#8220;beef&#8221; it has to<br />
   be whining if you don&#8217;t agree? I thought<br />
   Liberals were so &#8220;in touch&#8221; with their<br />
   fellow man?  If that&#8217;s the case you should<br />
   &#8220;feel my pain&#8221;  right?  I think it serves<br />
   the Rockies right they got swept.  They<br />
   played AT HOME for a bunch of non<br />
   Coloradoans who paid ticket brokers big<br />
   bucks and I&#8217;m sure the Rockies took<br />
   advantage.  I GOT THROUGH on the website<br />
   and got timed out when I was completing<br />
   my order.  It was rigged and in retro<br />
   spect I&#8217;m GLAD I didn&#8217;t spend $600 on<br />
   tickets because I would have gone to watch<br />
   them get their butts kicked, like a loyal<br />
   fan.</p>
<p>   Cheers</p>
<p>   Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildflower</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-875</link>
		<author>Wildflower</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-875</guid>
					<description>I give Tom Tancredo a lot of credit for trying to focus attention on illegal immigration.  This problem has not been properly addressed by either party.  In fact, the Democrats seem to be in lockstep with the president on this. Noone seems to listen to the American people, who do not want a fast track to citizenship for illegal immigrants.  Our country simply cannot accommodate 15 or 20 million new citizens. And it's a slap in the face to those who came here legally.

On Halloween night, two large groups of Spanish-speaking people came to my door for trick-or-treating. Some "kids" were as big as adults, and there were several adults on the fringe.  They continued to stand there after I gave the treats. When they finally left I saw a couple of large vans parked nearby and realized those groups were not from our neighborhood.

A parent of a small child later told me that a neighbor had to tell the large groups to move out of the way after giving them the treats, so the little kids from the neighborhood could get to the door. (The neighborhood kids come in groups of one or two and usually under 5 years old, and the parents often wait down at the end of the sidewalk).There are few older kids in the neighborhood.

The parent told me that two houses had set out huge bowls of treats because they weren't home. It's an honors system around here and the kids usually only take one.  When the little neighborhood children behind the big groups of non-English speakers got there, the huge bowls were empty.

Is this the way it will be someday if they are granted citizenship?  Will the immigrants use up all  our country's  resources so that there is nothing left for our own children?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give Tom Tancredo a lot of credit for trying to focus attention on illegal immigration.  This problem has not been properly addressed by either party.  In fact, the Democrats seem to be in lockstep with the president on this. Noone seems to listen to the American people, who do not want a fast track to citizenship for illegal immigrants.  Our country simply cannot accommodate 15 or 20 million new citizens. And it&#8217;s a slap in the face to those who came here legally.</p>
<p>On Halloween night, two large groups of Spanish-speaking people came to my door for trick-or-treating. Some &#8220;kids&#8221; were as big as adults, and there were several adults on the fringe.  They continued to stand there after I gave the treats. When they finally left I saw a couple of large vans parked nearby and realized those groups were not from our neighborhood.</p>
<p>A parent of a small child later told me that a neighbor had to tell the large groups to move out of the way after giving them the treats, so the little kids from the neighborhood could get to the door. (The neighborhood kids come in groups of one or two and usually under 5 years old, and the parents often wait down at the end of the sidewalk).There are few older kids in the neighborhood.</p>
<p>The parent told me that two houses had set out huge bowls of treats because they weren&#8217;t home. It&#8217;s an honors system around here and the kids usually only take one.  When the little neighborhood children behind the big groups of non-English speakers got there, the huge bowls were empty.</p>
<p>Is this the way it will be someday if they are granted citizenship?  Will the immigrants use up all  our country&#8217;s  resources so that there is nothing left for our own children?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-878</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-878</guid>
					<description>Wildflower, that's some story.  And the
     socalled leadership minus Tom Tancredo
     don't give a damn.  About Halloween
     candy or public services.  Or our country
     and it's borders and citizens for that
     matter. These people and they are people
     are here illegally and you can thank
     criminal like former mayor Web who 
     thumb their noses at the rule of law when
     it suits them.  What is it call re-con
     quisidore?  They think this is their 
     rightful land and our leaders are letting
     them take it for potential votes and
     cheap labor.  It's a crime. It's Illegal
     ask Jim Spencer about the law and then
     ask him about Tom Tancredo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wildflower, that&#8217;s some story.  And the<br />
     socalled leadership minus Tom Tancredo<br />
     don&#8217;t give a damn.  About Halloween<br />
     candy or public services.  Or our country<br />
     and it&#8217;s borders and citizens for that<br />
     matter. These people and they are people<br />
     are here illegally and you can thank<br />
     criminal like former mayor Web who<br />
     thumb their noses at the rule of law when<br />
     it suits them.  What is it call re-con<br />
     quisidore?  They think this is their<br />
     rightful land and our leaders are letting<br />
     them take it for potential votes and<br />
     cheap labor.  It&#8217;s a crime. It&#8217;s Illegal<br />
     ask Jim Spencer about the law and then<br />
     ask him about Tom Tancredo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LHKMAN</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-882</link>
		<author>LHKMAN</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-882</guid>
					<description>Right on, Dennis.  No one but Dennis has the best interests of the country in his heart.  Only Dennis.  Yeah, yeah, yeah.  Get over yourself, Dennis.  The right-wing rants get tiresome after a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, Dennis.  No one but Dennis has the best interests of the country in his heart.  Only Dennis.  Yeah, yeah, yeah.  Get over yourself, Dennis.  The right-wing rants get tiresome after a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-892</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/11/01/tancredos-successor-wont-be-tommy-one-note/#comment-892</guid>
					<description>LHKMAN, as i said before I wouldn't presume
    to know what anyone has in their heart.
    I can only judge them by their words and
    actions.  And the words and actions of
    our U.S. leadership INCLUDING GEORGE
    BUSH, is one of complacency and deceit
    where illegal immigration and border
    security is concerned!  We have a corrupt
    government but we also have a knee jerk
    government and it's going to take a 
    terrorist nuke blowing up LA before they
    close our damn borders.  The economic
    effects of illegal immigration are already
    in force and irreversable.  They sold
    us down the river.  Sometimes I think I
    am the only one that has the best interests
    of the country at heart LHKMAN, everybody
    is just in it for themselves anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LHKMAN, as i said before I wouldn&#8217;t presume<br />
    to know what anyone has in their heart.<br />
    I can only judge them by their words and<br />
    actions.  And the words and actions of<br />
    our U.S. leadership INCLUDING GEORGE<br />
    BUSH, is one of complacency and deceit<br />
    where illegal immigration and border<br />
    security is concerned!  We have a corrupt<br />
    government but we also have a knee jerk<br />
    government and it&#8217;s going to take a<br />
    terrorist nuke blowing up LA before they<br />
    close our damn borders.  The economic<br />
    effects of illegal immigration are already<br />
    in force and irreversable.  They sold<br />
    us down the river.  Sometimes I think I<br />
    am the only one that has the best interests<br />
    of the country at heart LHKMAN, everybody<br />
    is just in it for themselves anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
