Comments on: Hate Crimes Demand a Special Response

By: dennis hammond

dennis hammond — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:07:26 +0000

No Jim, ANY crime against people should be
dealt with SEVERELY!!!!!!!!!!!
Violent crime period, what’s the term?
Oh, yeah, NOT TOLERANCE.

To pick and chose WHICH violent crime deserves touch punishment is to minimize any
violent crime.

And whose soft on violent crime?

Liberals.

People deserve their just desert and their
must be a deterant factor. A few public
hangings down at Civic Center park and
violent crime would disapear (or at least
the perpetrators)

My heart went out to this poor child. They
need to throw away the key on these animals

By: Wildflower

Wildflower — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:43:59 +0000

Well, since public hangings in the park are illegal, perhaps we can make the perpetrators disppear into the bowels of prison forever.Particularly if they are put in close proximity with Crips or Bloods..let the punishment fit the crime. The courts need to make a strong statement on this case to thwart future cases of hate crimes. No matter what they do, it won’t be enough to make up for the torment this girl has gone through.

By: noidea

noidea — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:07:15 +0000

I have to hand it to you Dennis. You are single handedly driving me to the other side of these debates and my affiliations.

By: dennis hammond

dennis hammond — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:42:30 +0000

All I”m saying noidea is that we go
back to frontier justice. A speedy
trial and a speedy hanging. Look what
the Wildflower generation has gotten us.
RAMPANT violent crime. Face it, as a
nation we are soft on violent crime
meanwhile we lock people up for smoking
a joint. IT”S IDIOTIC

I guarantee you if we got tough on violent
offenders they’d think twice. What happens
to them now, prison with their friends
where they get free medical, dental
cable TV they can pump weights and confer
with other bad apples get out and do it
all over again. Our system of crime and
punishment has become a JOKE. There is
no DETERANT. If you call that enlighten-
ment I say it’s prety dark. Especially
for these victims.

By: usersuz

usersuz — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:25:49 +0000

So was it a hate crime based on race? Or on gender? They may have called her N—–, but they raped her. Is there a law to cover hate crimes against women? Shouldn’t rape be considered a hate crime (almost exclusively) against women? One of these people was a former boyfriend of hers. Are we perhaps overlooking the most prevalent hate crime of all in the U.S.?

By: Jim Spencer

Jim Spencer — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:29:19 +0000

Guys,
I just nuked a Dennis comment because he compared another commenter to an earth worm. I remind you all to stick to the issues. We can have a lively discussion WITHOUT PERSONAL ATTACKS. STOP CALLING EACH OTHER NAMES.

By: dennis hammond

dennis hammond — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:03:25 +0000

All I can say is I call them like I
see them. Someone who doesn’t have
the spine to allow society to dispense
justice (capital punishment) but would
rather defer to gang members in prison
(crips and bloods) to mete out “justice”
is indeed some sort or invertibrate.
Take your pick.

Editing that comment absolutely went
over the Liberal censorship line.

Especially
by someone who defended our President
to be defiled, very distastefully
and very disrespectfully in a public
newspaper. Typical Liberal hypocrisy.
You people are the censors, you people
are the deniers of civil rights.

Here’s the difference between Liberals
and Conservatives. Liberals are
concerned primarily
with words and ideas, intangibles.
Why, because they are “social engineers”
who’s main goal is to manipulate society,
to control what it THINKS.
For instance: What was the mindset of
these people torturing this poor girl
in Charleston? Did their thoughts
reflect on a societal belief which is
frowned upon by the Liberal
intelligencia? Does it reflect on
society in general? “Hatred” of
minorities, women? Some victim group?

Conservatives want law and order, people
to be safe and some kind of order in
society, the thinking and motivation of
lawbreakers is irrelevant. That’s their
business but punishment for those
responsible for crimes against people
is critical is society is to maintain
law and order. Hence, just
as Spencer said: SOME violence is WORSE
than other. Why? Because it attacks
sponsored societal beliefs imposed by
the Liberal elite. The individual
matters not, it’s the COLLECTIVE!

That is warped thinking. That is
I’m going to use another bad word here)
SOCIALISM You guys.

By: dennis hammond

dennis hammond — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:12:56 +0000

Just an idea Jim a BETTER title for
your column: Spencer Censors.
Rolls off the tongue better.

By: dennis hammond

dennis hammond — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:22:15 +0000

Here’s a recent quote from a major
closet Liberal and social engineer
who (ha) thinks she’s fit to be
president of the United States “It’s time
to put an end to “Society on your own”.
“It’s time for shared responsibility for
shared prosperity” This from Socialist
Hillary Clinton, one of the ELITE I spoke
of. These are rules which apply to YOU.

Shared responsibility for shared prosperity.
SOCIALISM. Which eventually (after the
First and Second Amendment are gone)
becomes COMMUNISM. The Clintons initial
platform was “We’re going to reinvent
government” what they really meant was
“We’re going to reinvent COMMUNISM”

By: Wildflower

Wildflower — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:34:14 +0000

Begging your pardon Dennis regarding this system of rampant crime you refer to:
What party has been in power for 7 years?
Certainly not the one I voted for.
What party has removed capable judges from office and put in their own? Not the one I voted for.
What party has fomented hatred and divisiveness and poverty across the country and let illegal drugs flow in like a sieve? Not the one I voted for.

By: dennis hammond

dennis hammond — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:11:43 +0000

I don’t know what party? Remember
Wildflower most of what the current
administration has been doing for
the last 7 years is fix the damage
of the prior 8 under Clinton.

Remember that party that went on
in Washington. Taxes were raised,
social engineering legislation passed,
our military was dismantled and decimated,
(the peace dividend) Terrorism went
unmonitored and unchecked,
A justice department was geared to
circumvent Congress (not that Congress
is much better) Everybody wants to
go to the part but nobody wants to
clean up. Is that the Party you’re
referring to?

By: dennis hammond

dennis hammond — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:23:59 +0000

By the way Wildflower I think Clinton
appointed more Federal judges than
any president in history like 1600
all activists and all appointed for
life if I’m not mistaken. There
the one’s making these half baked
decisions and legislating from the
bench. That’s part of the social
engineering.

By: Sasha

Sasha — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 03:43:54 +0000

You can delete all of Dennis Hammond’s rantings as far as I’m concerned. I no longer read them.

By: usersuz

usersuz — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:58:31 +0000

Let me raise the issue again: is rape a hate crime - against women? This is an important IDEA. Jim says, “A special crime occurs where prejudice empowers a person to think he or she can attack another because the victim is an inferior human being.” Would Bruce DeBoskey sign on to the idea that rape is a hate crime against women? Would Veronica Garcia allow that it was more germane that the victim is a woman than what her color is? This is not sexual orientation, as her orientation was irrelevant to the perpetrators; it was her sex, period. Yes? No? Discuss.

By: dennis hammond

dennis hammond — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:10:01 +0000

Sasha,

Now THAT hurt!