<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACLU Plans Meeting to Settle Student Phone Seizures</title>
	<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/</link>
	<description>Here are my thoughts; share yours</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-591</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-591</guid>
					<description>I think we're all wiretapping felons,
    just go into the grocery store and you'll
    be subjected to other people's cell phone
    conversations, especially those who have
    phones planted in body orifaces and appear
    to me talking to themselves.  Very 
    annoying.  When I went to school we had
    nuns and they were authorized to do what-
    ever they wanted, it was NOT a Democracy
    there.  Hence, we we're fairly educated

    More silliness from the ACLU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#8217;re all wiretapping felons,<br />
    just go into the grocery store and you&#8217;ll<br />
    be subjected to other people&#8217;s cell phone<br />
    conversations, especially those who have<br />
    phones planted in body orifaces and appear<br />
    to me talking to themselves.  Very<br />
    annoying.  When I went to school we had<br />
    nuns and they were authorized to do what-<br />
    ever they wanted, it was NOT a Democracy<br />
    there.  Hence, we we&#8217;re fairly educated</p>
<p>    More silliness from the ACLU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-592</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-592</guid>
					<description>The latest oxymoron: Public Education</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest oxymoron: Public Education</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rathmone</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-593</link>
		<author>rathmone</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-593</guid>
					<description>Though not, evidently, educated well enough to learn English.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though not, evidently, educated well enough to learn English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kujack</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-594</link>
		<author>kujack</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-594</guid>
					<description>More silliness from the ACLU? Protecting our constitutional rights is "silliness", Dennis? I guess protesting a very small tax during the Revolutionary War was more silliness from Washington, Jefferson, Adams. I guess World War Two was just more silliness from crzy internationalists? Maybe the civil rights movement was just some silliness from the NAACP. All those just causes would have been lost if they depended on people so cavalier about their rights as you. May god help us if important watch dogs like the ACLU ever dissapear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More silliness from the ACLU? Protecting our constitutional rights is &#8220;silliness&#8221;, Dennis? I guess protesting a very small tax during the Revolutionary War was more silliness from Washington, Jefferson, Adams. I guess World War Two was just more silliness from crzy internationalists? Maybe the civil rights movement was just some silliness from the NAACP. All those just causes would have been lost if they depended on people so cavalier about their rights as you. May god help us if important watch dogs like the ACLU ever dissapear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noidea</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-596</link>
		<author>noidea</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-596</guid>
					<description>Dennis.

You can't be serious.  What does this have to do with invasion of privacy?  Do you, or your children, want to be subjected to a search of not only your personal belongings, but also your thoughts and communications with others without a search warrant executed by a judge? There was absolutely no reason to search this young man's text messages. This is the slippery slope that I was referring to..

What type of society do you want to live in?  The words that you choose to use on this and many other subjects reflect those of the Soviet Union in their hey day... I am certain from your rhetoric that you would definitely not want to be associated with that regime...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t be serious.  What does this have to do with invasion of privacy?  Do you, or your children, want to be subjected to a search of not only your personal belongings, but also your thoughts and communications with others without a search warrant executed by a judge? There was absolutely no reason to search this young man&#8217;s text messages. This is the slippery slope that I was referring to..</p>
<p>What type of society do you want to live in?  The words that you choose to use on this and many other subjects reflect those of the Soviet Union in their hey day&#8230; I am certain from your rhetoric that you would definitely not want to be associated with that regime&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-597</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-597</guid>
					<description>Noidea, I don't see this as anything 
   different from the teacher intercepting
   the paper written note passed through
   class 40 years ago.  I suppose that was
   an invasion of privacy as well?  Well,
   it was- anything that detracted or
   distracted from the mission was fare game.

   As for the population at large (being
   monitored) I believe the 
   government has been using a system called
   Echelon, a system of many Cray computers
   in Gulf Breeze, able to monitor all tele-
   communications in the country.  That's
   twenty year old stuff.

   Remember noidea there's a couple hundred
   million of us, they don't have the resources
   to bug us THAT much.  Don't worry just
   make secure the Fist and Second Amendments
   and they'll behave.

   Rathmone, I did say "fairly" and obviously
   well enough (my command of English) that
   A) I pissed you off and B) that you
   employed directive 3)
   from the Liberal Debating Handbook.  Score
   one for me!  FYI  Step 3) If you can't win
   the argument, criticise the grammer, usage
   or spelling  YOU LOSE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noidea, I don&#8217;t see this as anything<br />
   different from the teacher intercepting<br />
   the paper written note passed through<br />
   class 40 years ago.  I suppose that was<br />
   an invasion of privacy as well?  Well,<br />
   it was- anything that detracted or<br />
   distracted from the mission was fare game.</p>
<p>   As for the population at large (being<br />
   monitored) I believe the<br />
   government has been using a system called<br />
   Echelon, a system of many Cray computers<br />
   in Gulf Breeze, able to monitor all tele-<br />
   communications in the country.  That&#8217;s<br />
   twenty year old stuff.</p>
<p>   Remember noidea there&#8217;s a couple hundred<br />
   million of us, they don&#8217;t have the resources<br />
   to bug us THAT much.  Don&#8217;t worry just<br />
   make secure the Fist and Second Amendments<br />
   and they&#8217;ll behave.</p>
<p>   Rathmone, I did say &#8220;fairly&#8221; and obviously<br />
   well enough (my command of English) that<br />
   A) I pissed you off and B) that you<br />
   employed directive 3)<br />
   from the Liberal Debating Handbook.  Score<br />
   one for me!  FYI  Step 3) If you can&#8217;t win<br />
   the argument, criticise the grammer, usage<br />
   or spelling  YOU LOSE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-598</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-598</guid>
					<description>Kojack, when you're protesting something
   substanitive, effecting adults civil rights
   email me
   I'll be there with you.  dennishammond366
   @comcast.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kojack, when you&#8217;re protesting something<br />
   substanitive, effecting adults civil rights<br />
   email me<br />
   I&#8217;ll be there with you.  dennishammond366<br />
   @comcast.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildflower</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-603</link>
		<author>Wildflower</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-603</guid>
					<description>Only the location of the schools is surprising. I've known of intense harassment of DPS students several years ago.
If the schools feel there is a problem they should discuss it with the parents, particularly if they think the student might be in an impaired condition. It is not the schools' right to pry into private communications. They're very good at ignoring a student's rights..and putting them under grilling that an adult would not stand for. According to the law then, maybe it is illegal for the parents to intercept messages too?
Well, the parents can always take the phone away if there is a problem, but even more effective is removing the car keys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only the location of the schools is surprising. I&#8217;ve known of intense harassment of DPS students several years ago.<br />
If the schools feel there is a problem they should discuss it with the parents, particularly if they think the student might be in an impaired condition. It is not the schools&#8217; right to pry into private communications. They&#8217;re very good at ignoring a student&#8217;s rights..and putting them under grilling that an adult would not stand for. According to the law then, maybe it is illegal for the parents to intercept messages too?<br />
Well, the parents can always take the phone away if there is a problem, but even more effective is removing the car keys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noidea</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-605</link>
		<author>noidea</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 03:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-605</guid>
					<description>My wife threw in that if the cell phone was in class during a test, they may be cheating from their text messages if they are looking at them.  But Dennis, this wasn't a case of somebody passing notes.  Or of a kid checking text during class. The cell phone was in a bag.  The bag was searched for contraband.  None was found and the school proceeded, with no probable cause or a search warrent, to read the private communications of a student.  Don't throw red herrings into the mix.  This is pure and simple invasion of privacy.  If you have any care to preserve this country this case should outrage you.  If it doesn't, then I don't know what to say to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife threw in that if the cell phone was in class during a test, they may be cheating from their text messages if they are looking at them.  But Dennis, this wasn&#8217;t a case of somebody passing notes.  Or of a kid checking text during class. The cell phone was in a bag.  The bag was searched for contraband.  None was found and the school proceeded, with no probable cause or a search warrent, to read the private communications of a student.  Don&#8217;t throw red herrings into the mix.  This is pure and simple invasion of privacy.  If you have any care to preserve this country this case should outrage you.  If it doesn&#8217;t, then I don&#8217;t know what to say to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-607</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 04:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-607</guid>
					<description>GO ROCKIES!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GO ROCKIES!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-608</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 04:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-608</guid>
					<description>No Wildflower-- even children have 
    Constitutionally protected rights and
    those are bestowed upon them just as
    soon as they move out of their parents
    home</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Wildflower&#8211; even children have<br />
    Constitutionally protected rights and<br />
    those are bestowed upon them just as<br />
    soon as they move out of their parents<br />
    home</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noidea</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-610</link>
		<author>noidea</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-610</guid>
					<description>By the way, my pontification is beginning to even annoy myself...I..must....get...away...as James T. Kirk would say... Peace out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, my pontification is beginning to even annoy myself&#8230;I..must&#8230;.get&#8230;away&#8230;as James T. Kirk would say&#8230; Peace out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-615</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 04:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-615</guid>
					<description>Noidea,

   No i think Kirk totally enjoyed his 
   pontificating and from what I understand
   it was in his contract.

   I find it hard to believe a personal cell
   phone was confiscated out of a purse and
   then read.  That's over the line but I
   would sure have some questions about 
   probable cause.  Without probable cause
   why would they do it?

   I'd like to hear all the facts of the
   incident</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noidea,</p>
<p>   No i think Kirk totally enjoyed his<br />
   pontificating and from what I understand<br />
   it was in his contract.</p>
<p>   I find it hard to believe a personal cell<br />
   phone was confiscated out of a purse and<br />
   then read.  That&#8217;s over the line but I<br />
   would sure have some questions about<br />
   probable cause.  Without probable cause<br />
   why would they do it?</p>
<p>   I&#8217;d like to hear all the facts of the<br />
   incident</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usersuz</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-623</link>
		<author>usersuz</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-623</guid>
					<description>The difference from confiscating a note passed to another student is that by passing it, he makes it public and therefore subject to confiscation. This does not give the teacher automatic access to his notebook or diary. Ferret out, indeed! (Accent on the "ferret") When these cell phones are confiscated, the school personnel are opening up all the files and passing judgment on this person's private life. Sounds like these school employees need to get a life of their own. I say they can confiscate the cell phone temporarily but they cannot look into its contents, never, not at all. What next, will they draw blood to test for AIDS or nicotine or whatever? Now, if the principal wants to do body cavity searches, that's different...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference from confiscating a note passed to another student is that by passing it, he makes it public and therefore subject to confiscation. This does not give the teacher automatic access to his notebook or diary. Ferret out, indeed! (Accent on the &#8220;ferret&#8221;) When these cell phones are confiscated, the school personnel are opening up all the files and passing judgment on this person&#8217;s private life. Sounds like these school employees need to get a life of their own. I say they can confiscate the cell phone temporarily but they cannot look into its contents, never, not at all. What next, will they draw blood to test for AIDS or nicotine or whatever? Now, if the principal wants to do body cavity searches, that&#8217;s different&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kujack</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-650</link>
		<author>kujack</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-650</guid>
					<description>Well, Dennis, I am glad you will support adult civil rights. Problem is nowhere in the Constiution does it mention the rights being earned, restricted to adults, or granted once they move out of a parents house. As a matter of fact, our founders believed those rights were granted by the "creator", and thus, merely by being born a person has them. Now I'll grant you if their was iminent danger the school should be free to search. If the infraction is related to the cell phone (ie the student is sending or reading a text in class), or if parents give permission, then by all means, search the phone. My understanding in this case though is that they only searched because everything else yielded no evidence of wrong doing, and that they never contacted parents to ask if this is ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Dennis, I am glad you will support adult civil rights. Problem is nowhere in the Constiution does it mention the rights being earned, restricted to adults, or granted once they move out of a parents house. As a matter of fact, our founders believed those rights were granted by the &#8220;creator&#8221;, and thus, merely by being born a person has them. Now I&#8217;ll grant you if their was iminent danger the school should be free to search. If the infraction is related to the cell phone (ie the student is sending or reading a text in class), or if parents give permission, then by all means, search the phone. My understanding in this case though is that they only searched because everything else yielded no evidence of wrong doing, and that they never contacted parents to ask if this is ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-678</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/10/12/aclu-plans-meeting-to-settle-student-phone-seizures/#comment-678</guid>
					<description>Kujack,

     Only since the so called age of enlighten-
     ment in public education (you know where
     kids are given birth control pills) have
     classrooms full of kids been considered
     "Democracies" repleat with the Bill of 
     Rights.  This also coincides with the 
     Liberal agenda of keeping kids
     illiterate.  This while pushing their
     social laboratory agendas, mostly
     feminism.  Liberals like to
     guote Justice
     Abe Fortus in his "landmark decision" in
     stating "You don't hang
     your civil rights at the school gate" but
     they never finish Fortus's ruling which
     states School officials need to determine
     curriculum and maintain order trumps the 
     Constituional right of kids in the class
     room.  My classrooms as a kid, resembled
     more closely totalitarian regimes and we
     were fairly educated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kujack,</p>
<p>     Only since the so called age of enlighten-<br />
     ment in public education (you know where<br />
     kids are given birth control pills) have<br />
     classrooms full of kids been considered<br />
     &#8220;Democracies&#8221; repleat with the Bill of<br />
     Rights.  This also coincides with the<br />
     Liberal agenda of keeping kids<br />
     illiterate.  This while pushing their<br />
     social laboratory agendas, mostly<br />
     feminism.  Liberals like to<br />
     guote Justice<br />
     Abe Fortus in his &#8220;landmark decision&#8221; in<br />
     stating &#8220;You don&#8217;t hang<br />
     your civil rights at the school gate&#8221; but<br />
     they never finish Fortus&#8217;s ruling which<br />
     states School officials need to determine<br />
     curriculum and maintain order trumps the<br />
     Constituional right of kids in the class<br />
     room.  My classrooms as a kid, resembled<br />
     more closely totalitarian regimes and we<br />
     were fairly educated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
