<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excellence by Edict Fails Without Resources</title>
	<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/</link>
	<description>Here are my thoughts; share yours</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-321</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-321</guid>
					<description>Of course the problem is K-12 education in
   the United States. Talk about waiving requirements and succumbing to illiteracy!
   Most graduates CAN'T read and CAN'T Write
   and CAN'T cypher.  That's after 12 years
   of public education at $10,000 a year.
   That's appalling!  That's criminal! That's
   the state of public education.

   So called "Higher education" has become a
   remedial joke.  With most of studies targeting skills that normally and should 
  have been learned in elementary, middle
   and high school.  

   For the most part, higher education is a
   racket unto itself only the dollars involved
   are higher, the taxpayer still picks up
   most of the cost.  And educrats still sit
   on their well fed rear ends!!

   dennis hammond</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the problem is K-12 education in<br />
   the United States. Talk about waiving requirements and succumbing to illiteracy!<br />
   Most graduates CAN&#8217;T read and CAN&#8217;T Write<br />
   and CAN&#8217;T cypher.  That&#8217;s after 12 years<br />
   of public education at $10,000 a year.<br />
   That&#8217;s appalling!  That&#8217;s criminal! That&#8217;s<br />
   the state of public education.</p>
<p>   So called &#8220;Higher education&#8221; has become a<br />
   remedial joke.  With most of studies targeting skills that normally and should<br />
  have been learned in elementary, middle<br />
   and high school.  </p>
<p>   For the most part, higher education is a<br />
   racket unto itself only the dollars involved<br />
   are higher, the taxpayer still picks up<br />
   most of the cost.  And educrats still sit<br />
   on their well fed rear ends!!</p>
<p>   dennis hammond</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-322</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-322</guid>
					<description>By the way, I forgot to mention. Any attempt
  to address this problem, the failure of
  K-12 education, will start with the usual proclamation that public education is underfunded and that additional tax money is needed immediately.  Politicians and educrats love it, they FAIL at education and get REWARDED time and time again with more tax dollars.  THAT game has to STOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You don't reward people for doing a crappy job!! YOU REPLACE THEM!!!!!

dennis hammond</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, I forgot to mention. Any attempt<br />
  to address this problem, the failure of<br />
  K-12 education, will start with the usual proclamation that public education is underfunded and that additional tax money is needed immediately.  Politicians and educrats love it, they FAIL at education and get REWARDED time and time again with more tax dollars.  THAT game has to STOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t reward people for doing a crappy job!! YOU REPLACE THEM!!!!!</p>
<p>dennis hammond</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-323</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-323</guid>
					<description>Further, As for "Higher education" I just spoke last night with a young person who graduated last year from a state university with a degree in Computer Information Systems.  A year later she STILL
hasn't been able to find a job utilizing her
degree and is still waiting tables.  She did
however accumulate over $100,000 in student loans.  KA CHING!  The educrats ALWAYS get their
money UP FRONT!  Either in tuition or tax dollars  And the kids, the students get
 shafted with worthless unmarketable degrees.

It's the educational Industial complex and educational consumer better start considering the VALUE of higher education.  In some cases it's NIL! AND expensive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further, As for &#8220;Higher education&#8221; I just spoke last night with a young person who graduated last year from a state university with a degree in Computer Information Systems.  A year later she STILL<br />
hasn&#8217;t been able to find a job utilizing her<br />
degree and is still waiting tables.  She did<br />
however accumulate over $100,000 in student loans.  KA CHING!  The educrats ALWAYS get their<br />
money UP FRONT!  Either in tuition or tax dollars  And the kids, the students get<br />
 shafted with worthless unmarketable degrees.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the educational Industial complex and educational consumer better start considering the VALUE of higher education.  In some cases it&#8217;s NIL! AND expensive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davebarnes</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-324</link>
		<author>davebarnes</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-324</guid>
					<description>Or, all the kids in rural communities could move to the big city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, all the kids in rural communities could move to the big city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LHKMAN</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-325</link>
		<author>LHKMAN</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-325</guid>
					<description>In my day, admittedly decades ago, there was no federal Department of Education.  States and communities ran the public schools and set the standards.  Citizens chose to live in certain communities or not to based on the quality of the schools.  Mine, fortunately, required four years of English, three of math, two of science and three of social studies.  My community taxed itself reasonably heavily to do this.  The entire communicty took pride in its schools, including taxpayers who had no children in the schools, but who believed their property values were increased by having good schools.

For some reason unknown to me, Colorado has a streak of paranoia when it comes to paying taxes for anything, which is why congestion continues to grow and schools do not get better.

Sorry, Jim, I don't have a nice easy solution for the problem you write about, just some experiences that demonstrate it doesn't have to be that way.  Oh, by the way, I went to my high school 50th reunion a couple of years ago, and the community now is tearing down the schools I went to and rebuilding new.  It still treasures good public education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my day, admittedly decades ago, there was no federal Department of Education.  States and communities ran the public schools and set the standards.  Citizens chose to live in certain communities or not to based on the quality of the schools.  Mine, fortunately, required four years of English, three of math, two of science and three of social studies.  My community taxed itself reasonably heavily to do this.  The entire communicty took pride in its schools, including taxpayers who had no children in the schools, but who believed their property values were increased by having good schools.</p>
<p>For some reason unknown to me, Colorado has a streak of paranoia when it comes to paying taxes for anything, which is why congestion continues to grow and schools do not get better.</p>
<p>Sorry, Jim, I don&#8217;t have a nice easy solution for the problem you write about, just some experiences that demonstrate it doesn&#8217;t have to be that way.  Oh, by the way, I went to my high school 50th reunion a couple of years ago, and the community now is tearing down the schools I went to and rebuilding new.  It still treasures good public education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-326</link>
		<author>Keith</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-326</guid>
					<description>I don't think Jim is suggesting doing away with Public education, but rather start funding it.  But the right-wing anti-taxpayers, always have to try to get onboard the education problem wagon, claiming it's the fault of: the teacher's unions, the education professional (e.g teachers), inefficient use of taxpayer dollars (like art, music, PE, and other "liberal" agendas)[pick one!].  

Our education system in this country lags behind other lesser countries, because unlike these other countries, WE DON'T BELIEVE EDUCATION SHOULD COST ANYTHING!.  Ask any Republican or libertarian if they believe we need a Dept. of Education or if our taxes should go towards education.  They believe the private industry can provide the answer in cheap private schools going to the lowest bidder; except for their kids, because now they want "choice!"  Check out how much this country spends on public education compared to these other countries.

This same group believes "anyone can teach," so let's just bring non-educational professionals and let them teach our kids - good enough! Anyone with a degree can teach stuff they already learned, right? And let's just pay them what they pay those waitresses -cause anyone can teach!

I saw a bumper sticker yesterday, that read "After we rebuild Iraq, how about rebuilding our schools?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Jim is suggesting doing away with Public education, but rather start funding it.  But the right-wing anti-taxpayers, always have to try to get onboard the education problem wagon, claiming it&#8217;s the fault of: the teacher&#8217;s unions, the education professional (e.g teachers), inefficient use of taxpayer dollars (like art, music, PE, and other &#8220;liberal&#8221; agendas)[pick one!].  </p>
<p>Our education system in this country lags behind other lesser countries, because unlike these other countries, WE DON&#8217;T BELIEVE EDUCATION SHOULD COST ANYTHING!.  Ask any Republican or libertarian if they believe we need a Dept. of Education or if our taxes should go towards education.  They believe the private industry can provide the answer in cheap private schools going to the lowest bidder; except for their kids, because now they want &#8220;choice!&#8221;  Check out how much this country spends on public education compared to these other countries.</p>
<p>This same group believes &#8220;anyone can teach,&#8221; so let&#8217;s just bring non-educational professionals and let them teach our kids - good enough! Anyone with a degree can teach stuff they already learned, right? And let&#8217;s just pay them what they pay those waitresses -cause anyone can teach!</p>
<p>I saw a bumper sticker yesterday, that read &#8220;After we rebuild Iraq, how about rebuilding our schools?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-327</link>
		<author>Keith</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-327</guid>
					<description>"Standards!  We don't need any stinking standards!"  What's the objective of higher education.  I have to agree somewhat with the righties, that they're all in this for profit.  I'm paying for over 23 years of college education for three kids to get four year degrees, because the schools don't schedule the required classes if there's not enough students.  They make rules to make the kids go longer.  Try getting a teaching degree!  You know only have to have a separate major emphasis, but you have to take entry exams and have a 2.75 GPA just to student teach.  Then you have to write a masters-like thesis to graduate.  Meanwhile non-teaching professionals are stepping into our classrooms through the back door.

I have a Masters degree, my wife a near PhD, but any of us will admit that of all the courses we all took for our career, very little eventually replied, and the other courses that were required to make us "more rounded" - how much can you remember from these?  With the right pushing private schools and schools for profit, the tech school industry is growing.  They recognize you don't need four years of BS courses to become a vet tech or legal aide.  Four year colleges are in open competition for your tuition $, and maybe streamlining a degree will become competitive.  It's not that we need standards, (or standards testing) we need to support and fund our schools.  The problem Jim addresses is bigger than just funding schools to provide the english, science, and math required to get into college, but graduating more literate and smarter high school graduates.  

Until we start respect our education professionals and it's system by adequately funding it and let the EDUCATION professionals fix the problems and not the business professionals, we're going to continue to lag behind other countries in our educational product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Standards!  We don&#8217;t need any stinking standards!&#8221;  What&#8217;s the objective of higher education.  I have to agree somewhat with the righties, that they&#8217;re all in this for profit.  I&#8217;m paying for over 23 years of college education for three kids to get four year degrees, because the schools don&#8217;t schedule the required classes if there&#8217;s not enough students.  They make rules to make the kids go longer.  Try getting a teaching degree!  You know only have to have a separate major emphasis, but you have to take entry exams and have a 2.75 GPA just to student teach.  Then you have to write a masters-like thesis to graduate.  Meanwhile non-teaching professionals are stepping into our classrooms through the back door.</p>
<p>I have a Masters degree, my wife a near PhD, but any of us will admit that of all the courses we all took for our career, very little eventually replied, and the other courses that were required to make us &#8220;more rounded&#8221; - how much can you remember from these?  With the right pushing private schools and schools for profit, the tech school industry is growing.  They recognize you don&#8217;t need four years of BS courses to become a vet tech or legal aide.  Four year colleges are in open competition for your tuition $, and maybe streamlining a degree will become competitive.  It&#8217;s not that we need standards, (or standards testing) we need to support and fund our schools.  The problem Jim addresses is bigger than just funding schools to provide the english, science, and math required to get into college, but graduating more literate and smarter high school graduates.  </p>
<p>Until we start respect our education professionals and it&#8217;s system by adequately funding it and let the EDUCATION professionals fix the problems and not the business professionals, we&#8217;re going to continue to lag behind other countries in our educational product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim in Aurora</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-328</link>
		<author>Jim in Aurora</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-328</guid>
					<description>You nailed it again. Want to hear what you have to say on today's Denver Post front page block-buster concerning the 12,000 displaced Iraquis being moved here to Denver, starting tomorrow.(Ironic isn't it..on 9/11) I sure don't remember voting on this. WW2,we locked the enemy away in concentration camps, now we offer them a total freeby with homes and the works. How about the guys and gals in our VA hospitals with missing limbs asking for Govt. help? God help us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You nailed it again. Want to hear what you have to say on today&#8217;s Denver Post front page block-buster concerning the 12,000 displaced Iraquis being moved here to Denver, starting tomorrow.(Ironic isn&#8217;t it..on 9/11) I sure don&#8217;t remember voting on this. WW2,we locked the enemy away in concentration camps, now we offer them a total freeby with homes and the works. How about the guys and gals in our VA hospitals with missing limbs asking for Govt. help? God help us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-329</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-329</guid>
					<description>It's always the money for the "Educational
  Establishment"  "NOT ENOUGH MONEY" Boo hoo!

  I went to a DIRT POOR Catholic school for 
  grades first through eighth. I was an OK
  student in Catholic school, pretty 
  average.   When I made the SWITCH to PUBLIC 
  SCHOOL they  MOVED ME AHEAD A GRADE!!!!

  NOW, TELL ME, IS IT THE MONEY THAT EDUCATES 
  KIDS IN FUNDAMENTALS LIKE READING, WRITING,
  AND ARITHMETIC???????  OR METHODS AND
  DISAPLINE AND A CURRICULUM WHICH STRESSES
              BASICS!!

    IT"S DEDICATION BY TEACHERS. CONTROL
  BY TEACHERS (NOT ATTORNEYS) AND PARENTS
  WHO PARTICIPATE IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS!

  IT'S ALWAY THE MONEY WITH EDUCRATS AND 
  LIBERALS AND THEY STILL! DON'T SUCCEED!!

  IN THE WARPED MINDS OF LIBERALS YOU CAN
  NEVER SPEND ENOUGH MONEY ON PUBLIC EDUCATION
  BUT MASSIVE INCREASES IN FUNDING AND CONTINUED LOW STANDARDIZED TEST SCORES SHOW
  CLEARLY, IT AIN'T THE MONEY.

  dennis hammond</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always the money for the &#8220;Educational<br />
  Establishment&#8221;  &#8220;NOT ENOUGH MONEY&#8221; Boo hoo!</p>
<p>  I went to a DIRT POOR Catholic school for<br />
  grades first through eighth. I was an OK<br />
  student in Catholic school, pretty<br />
  average.   When I made the SWITCH to PUBLIC<br />
  SCHOOL they  MOVED ME AHEAD A GRADE!!!!</p>
<p>  NOW, TELL ME, IS IT THE MONEY THAT EDUCATES<br />
  KIDS IN FUNDAMENTALS LIKE READING, WRITING,<br />
  AND ARITHMETIC???????  OR METHODS AND<br />
  DISAPLINE AND A CURRICULUM WHICH STRESSES<br />
              BASICS!!</p>
<p>    IT&#8221;S DEDICATION BY TEACHERS. CONTROL<br />
  BY TEACHERS (NOT ATTORNEYS) AND PARENTS<br />
  WHO PARTICIPATE IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS!</p>
<p>  IT&#8217;S ALWAY THE MONEY WITH EDUCRATS AND<br />
  LIBERALS AND THEY STILL! DON&#8217;T SUCCEED!!</p>
<p>  IN THE WARPED MINDS OF LIBERALS YOU CAN<br />
  NEVER SPEND ENOUGH MONEY ON PUBLIC EDUCATION<br />
  BUT MASSIVE INCREASES IN FUNDING AND CONTINUED LOW STANDARDIZED TEST SCORES SHOW<br />
  CLEARLY, IT AIN&#8217;T THE MONEY.</p>
<p>  dennis hammond</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clj</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-331</link>
		<author>clj</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-331</guid>
					<description>dennis your right wing rants are getting old</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dennis your right wing rants are getting old</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis hammond</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-333</link>
		<author>dennis hammond</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-333</guid>
					<description>clj,

  the TRUTH NEVER gets old.
  Government waste, inefficiency and
  corruption does, however, get OLD!

  dennis hammond</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>clj,</p>
<p>  the TRUTH NEVER gets old.<br />
  Government waste, inefficiency and<br />
  corruption does, however, get OLD!</p>
<p>  dennis hammond</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Spencer</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-337</link>
		<author>Jim Spencer</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-337</guid>
					<description>This is a letter to me from David Skaggs, the director of the Colorado Commission on Higher Education:

Your September 10th story, â€œCanâ€™t Meet Education Standards, Just Waive â€˜Emâ€ argued that the Commission on Higher Education essentially postponed the 2008 Higher Education Admissions Requirements (â€œHEARâ€) and intended to waive future admission requirements. This does not accurately characterize the Commissionâ€™s actions with regard to admission requirements. 

The Commission did not postpone the 2008 requirements, but decided to add other criteria and some temporary flexibility.  It approved a policy to allow an â€œindex scoreâ€ 10 points higher than the normal threshold to serve as an alternative to meeting prescribed curriculum for 2008 and 2009 graduates. This standard is probably more rigorous than the 2008 HEAR curriculum. The index score has been validated by research as a reliable predictor of college performance and of students who will not need costly remediation.  

Under existing state law, a so-called exemption â€œwindowâ€ allows each institution to admit a percentage of students who do not meet either the index or the HEAR.   The Commission decided only to administer this exemption â€œwindowâ€ on a statewide basis, not enlarge it, making it available to additional students who want to attend college work but havenâ€™t taken all the HEAR courses. This recognizes the fact that many students regrettably may decide to go to college late in their high school careers.

As for the 2010 phase of the HEAR, the Commission decided in July to maintain the rigor of standards but acknowledged that there may be school districts who are simply unable to hire or afford faculty for advanced math or foreign language instruction. To deal with that, we are in the process of drafting procedures and criteria for school districts who can not meet these curriculum requirements to demonstrate they have no alternative means of delivering that instruction. 

These combined actions by the Commission address the realities that students and school districts face but recognize the importance of standards which serve to help students and our state as a whole. 

Sincerely yours,
 
David E. Skaggs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a letter to me from David Skaggs, the director of the Colorado Commission on Higher Education:</p>
<p>Your September 10th story, â€œCanâ€™t Meet Education Standards, Just Waive â€˜Emâ€ argued that the Commission on Higher Education essentially postponed the 2008 Higher Education Admissions Requirements (â€œHEARâ€) and intended to waive future admission requirements. This does not accurately characterize the Commissionâ€™s actions with regard to admission requirements. </p>
<p>The Commission did not postpone the 2008 requirements, but decided to add other criteria and some temporary flexibility.  It approved a policy to allow an â€œindex scoreâ€ 10 points higher than the normal threshold to serve as an alternative to meeting prescribed curriculum for 2008 and 2009 graduates. This standard is probably more rigorous than the 2008 HEAR curriculum. The index score has been validated by research as a reliable predictor of college performance and of students who will not need costly remediation.  </p>
<p>Under existing state law, a so-called exemption â€œwindowâ€ allows each institution to admit a percentage of students who do not meet either the index or the HEAR.   The Commission decided only to administer this exemption â€œwindowâ€ on a statewide basis, not enlarge it, making it available to additional students who want to attend college work but havenâ€™t taken all the HEAR courses. This recognizes the fact that many students regrettably may decide to go to college late in their high school careers.</p>
<p>As for the 2010 phase of the HEAR, the Commission decided in July to maintain the rigor of standards but acknowledged that there may be school districts who are simply unable to hire or afford faculty for advanced math or foreign language instruction. To deal with that, we are in the process of drafting procedures and criteria for school districts who can not meet these curriculum requirements to demonstrate they have no alternative means of delivering that instruction. </p>
<p>These combined actions by the Commission address the realities that students and school districts face but recognize the importance of standards which serve to help students and our state as a whole. </p>
<p>Sincerely yours,</p>
<p>David E. Skaggs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LHKMAN</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-345</link>
		<author>LHKMAN</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-345</guid>
					<description>Dennis, it must be nice to live in a world of revealed truth.  Do you really think the world has changed all that much?  You must; it is the only explanation for your obviously closed mind.  Please change the subject of your next rant; thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, it must be nice to live in a world of revealed truth.  Do you really think the world has changed all that much?  You must; it is the only explanation for your obviously closed mind.  Please change the subject of your next rant; thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildflower</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-346</link>
		<author>Wildflower</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/10/excellence-by-edict-fails-without-resources/#comment-346</guid>
					<description>Why can't Johnny read or write?  I've been told by a reliable source that in 1st grade at a DPS school, Bradley Elementary, 30 min. per day is spent on reading.  That's 2 and 1/2 hours per week on reading.  TWO HOURS per week is spent teaching Spanish to the English speaking kids.
If this policy is consistent throughout DPS it's no wonder the kids are lagging behind.
As I've said before, wouldn't it be better to spend the Spanish teacher's time teaching English to non-English speakers?
Could I please have my tax money back..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t Johnny read or write?  I&#8217;ve been told by a reliable source that in 1st grade at a DPS school, Bradley Elementary, 30 min. per day is spent on reading.  That&#8217;s 2 and 1/2 hours per week on reading.  TWO HOURS per week is spent teaching Spanish to the English speaking kids.<br />
If this policy is consistent throughout DPS it&#8217;s no wonder the kids are lagging behind.<br />
As I&#8217;ve said before, wouldn&#8217;t it be better to spend the Spanish teacher&#8217;s time teaching English to non-English speakers?<br />
Could I please have my tax money back..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
