By Jim Spencer
SpencerSpeaks.com
The standards do not seem outrageous for young people who must compete in a high-tech world. Kids who go from
The problem is, thousands of them don’t. Worse, in some instances they can’t.
The state’s answer to this crisis?
Waive the standards.
If you want to know “Why Johnny Can’t Read†- and might never be able to – check out the attempt to apply minimal academic credentials to incoming freshmen in
The college prep high school course requirement that was supposed to go into effect in fall 2008 will be suspended in certain circumstances in 2008 and 2009.
Thus saith the Colorado Commission on Higher Education.
What the higher ed commission did not address – and can’t – is what’s going to change during 2008 and 2009 to forego an embarrassing public policy scandal. Until poor and rural school districts get the state and local money and support they need to offer the number of required college prep courses, standards means nothing.
When you consider that the higher ed commission has voted to make the college prep standard even more difficult in 2010, you see how humiliating this exercise in excellence by edict could become.
“Right now,†said higher ed spokesman John Karakoulakis, “the department staff is looking at waivers for 2010.
There has yet to be any discussion of formally scaling back the college-prep standards, said Karakoulakis. Waivers, he explained, “are looked at as a transitional process.â€
Without re-thinking or redistributing resources, the transition could become perpetual.
“Maybe the collision you’re predicting could become a catalytic moment,†said Speaker of the House Andrew Romanoff. “We’ll have to ask if our expectations are too high. If we are serious, this will force us as politicians, voters and citizens to make a tough call.â€
The need to better prepare the state’s college-bound high school grads is beyond question. The higher ed commission’s most recent assessment of entering freshmen showed that three in 10 required remedial courses because they lacked university-level skills.
Predictably, the number was highest in community college students, where over half needed remedial help. But four-year schools found that one in five students needed remedial help. That ranged from a low of 1 percent at the
Those numbers scream for attention. The attention, however, must come with a commitment from state and local governments to reorganize and finance public education. Romanoff hopes a gubernatorial task force on education from kindergarten through college will help do that.
Someone better do something.
Jokes.
Only the legal challenges that might result from these jokes will leave no one laughing.
“I’m not saying there’s a lawsuit here, but there are concerns,†said Kevin Welner, an attorney who directs the
Unless you plan to go with endless waivers, that eventually comes back to bite you.
Copyright 2007 by Jim Spencer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.




14 users commented in " Excellence by Edict Fails Without Resources "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackOf course the problem is K-12 education in
the United States. Talk about waiving requirements and succumbing to illiteracy!
Most graduates CAN’T read and CAN’T Write
and CAN’T cypher. That’s after 12 years
of public education at $10,000 a year.
That’s appalling! That’s criminal! That’s
the state of public education.
So called “Higher education” has become a
remedial joke. With most of studies targeting skills that normally and should
have been learned in elementary, middle
and high school.
For the most part, higher education is a
racket unto itself only the dollars involved
are higher, the taxpayer still picks up
most of the cost. And educrats still sit
on their well fed rear ends!!
dennis hammond
By the way, I forgot to mention. Any attempt
to address this problem, the failure of
K-12 education, will start with the usual proclamation that public education is underfunded and that additional tax money is needed immediately. Politicians and educrats love it, they FAIL at education and get REWARDED time and time again with more tax dollars. THAT game has to STOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You don’t reward people for doing a crappy job!! YOU REPLACE THEM!!!!!
dennis hammond
Further, As for “Higher education” I just spoke last night with a young person who graduated last year from a state university with a degree in Computer Information Systems. A year later she STILL
hasn’t been able to find a job utilizing her
degree and is still waiting tables. She did
however accumulate over $100,000 in student loans. KA CHING! The educrats ALWAYS get their
money UP FRONT! Either in tuition or tax dollars And the kids, the students get
shafted with worthless unmarketable degrees.
It’s the educational Industial complex and educational consumer better start considering the VALUE of higher education. In some cases it’s NIL! AND expensive!
Or, all the kids in rural communities could move to the big city.
In my day, admittedly decades ago, there was no federal Department of Education. States and communities ran the public schools and set the standards. Citizens chose to live in certain communities or not to based on the quality of the schools. Mine, fortunately, required four years of English, three of math, two of science and three of social studies. My community taxed itself reasonably heavily to do this. The entire communicty took pride in its schools, including taxpayers who had no children in the schools, but who believed their property values were increased by having good schools.
For some reason unknown to me, Colorado has a streak of paranoia when it comes to paying taxes for anything, which is why congestion continues to grow and schools do not get better.
Sorry, Jim, I don’t have a nice easy solution for the problem you write about, just some experiences that demonstrate it doesn’t have to be that way. Oh, by the way, I went to my high school 50th reunion a couple of years ago, and the community now is tearing down the schools I went to and rebuilding new. It still treasures good public education.
I don’t think Jim is suggesting doing away with Public education, but rather start funding it. But the right-wing anti-taxpayers, always have to try to get onboard the education problem wagon, claiming it’s the fault of: the teacher’s unions, the education professional (e.g teachers), inefficient use of taxpayer dollars (like art, music, PE, and other “liberal” agendas)[pick one!].
Our education system in this country lags behind other lesser countries, because unlike these other countries, WE DON’T BELIEVE EDUCATION SHOULD COST ANYTHING!. Ask any Republican or libertarian if they believe we need a Dept. of Education or if our taxes should go towards education. They believe the private industry can provide the answer in cheap private schools going to the lowest bidder; except for their kids, because now they want “choice!” Check out how much this country spends on public education compared to these other countries.
This same group believes “anyone can teach,” so let’s just bring non-educational professionals and let them teach our kids - good enough! Anyone with a degree can teach stuff they already learned, right? And let’s just pay them what they pay those waitresses -cause anyone can teach!
I saw a bumper sticker yesterday, that read “After we rebuild Iraq, how about rebuilding our schools?”
“Standards! We don’t need any stinking standards!” What’s the objective of higher education. I have to agree somewhat with the righties, that they’re all in this for profit. I’m paying for over 23 years of college education for three kids to get four year degrees, because the schools don’t schedule the required classes if there’s not enough students. They make rules to make the kids go longer. Try getting a teaching degree! You know only have to have a separate major emphasis, but you have to take entry exams and have a 2.75 GPA just to student teach. Then you have to write a masters-like thesis to graduate. Meanwhile non-teaching professionals are stepping into our classrooms through the back door.
I have a Masters degree, my wife a near PhD, but any of us will admit that of all the courses we all took for our career, very little eventually replied, and the other courses that were required to make us “more rounded” - how much can you remember from these? With the right pushing private schools and schools for profit, the tech school industry is growing. They recognize you don’t need four years of BS courses to become a vet tech or legal aide. Four year colleges are in open competition for your tuition $, and maybe streamlining a degree will become competitive. It’s not that we need standards, (or standards testing) we need to support and fund our schools. The problem Jim addresses is bigger than just funding schools to provide the english, science, and math required to get into college, but graduating more literate and smarter high school graduates.
Until we start respect our education professionals and it’s system by adequately funding it and let the EDUCATION professionals fix the problems and not the business professionals, we’re going to continue to lag behind other countries in our educational product.
You nailed it again. Want to hear what you have to say on today’s Denver Post front page block-buster concerning the 12,000 displaced Iraquis being moved here to Denver, starting tomorrow.(Ironic isn’t it..on 9/11) I sure don’t remember voting on this. WW2,we locked the enemy away in concentration camps, now we offer them a total freeby with homes and the works. How about the guys and gals in our VA hospitals with missing limbs asking for Govt. help? God help us all.
It’s always the money for the “Educational
Establishment” “NOT ENOUGH MONEY” Boo hoo!
I went to a DIRT POOR Catholic school for
grades first through eighth. I was an OK
student in Catholic school, pretty
average. When I made the SWITCH to PUBLIC
SCHOOL they MOVED ME AHEAD A GRADE!!!!
NOW, TELL ME, IS IT THE MONEY THAT EDUCATES
KIDS IN FUNDAMENTALS LIKE READING, WRITING,
AND ARITHMETIC??????? OR METHODS AND
DISAPLINE AND A CURRICULUM WHICH STRESSES
BASICS!!
IT”S DEDICATION BY TEACHERS. CONTROL
BY TEACHERS (NOT ATTORNEYS) AND PARENTS
WHO PARTICIPATE IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS!
IT’S ALWAY THE MONEY WITH EDUCRATS AND
LIBERALS AND THEY STILL! DON’T SUCCEED!!
IN THE WARPED MINDS OF LIBERALS YOU CAN
NEVER SPEND ENOUGH MONEY ON PUBLIC EDUCATION
BUT MASSIVE INCREASES IN FUNDING AND CONTINUED LOW STANDARDIZED TEST SCORES SHOW
CLEARLY, IT AIN’T THE MONEY.
dennis hammond
dennis your right wing rants are getting old
clj,
the TRUTH NEVER gets old.
Government waste, inefficiency and
corruption does, however, get OLD!
dennis hammond
This is a letter to me from David Skaggs, the director of the Colorado Commission on Higher Education:
Your September 10th story, “Can’t Meet Education Standards, Just Waive ‘Em†argued that the Commission on Higher Education essentially postponed the 2008 Higher Education Admissions Requirements (“HEARâ€) and intended to waive future admission requirements. This does not accurately characterize the Commission’s actions with regard to admission requirements.
The Commission did not postpone the 2008 requirements, but decided to add other criteria and some temporary flexibility. It approved a policy to allow an “index score†10 points higher than the normal threshold to serve as an alternative to meeting prescribed curriculum for 2008 and 2009 graduates. This standard is probably more rigorous than the 2008 HEAR curriculum. The index score has been validated by research as a reliable predictor of college performance and of students who will not need costly remediation.
Under existing state law, a so-called exemption “window†allows each institution to admit a percentage of students who do not meet either the index or the HEAR. The Commission decided only to administer this exemption “window†on a statewide basis, not enlarge it, making it available to additional students who want to attend college work but haven’t taken all the HEAR courses. This recognizes the fact that many students regrettably may decide to go to college late in their high school careers.
As for the 2010 phase of the HEAR, the Commission decided in July to maintain the rigor of standards but acknowledged that there may be school districts who are simply unable to hire or afford faculty for advanced math or foreign language instruction. To deal with that, we are in the process of drafting procedures and criteria for school districts who can not meet these curriculum requirements to demonstrate they have no alternative means of delivering that instruction.
These combined actions by the Commission address the realities that students and school districts face but recognize the importance of standards which serve to help students and our state as a whole.
Sincerely yours,
David E. Skaggs
Dennis, it must be nice to live in a world of revealed truth. Do you really think the world has changed all that much? You must; it is the only explanation for your obviously closed mind. Please change the subject of your next rant; thank you.
Why can’t Johnny read or write? I’ve been told by a reliable source that in 1st grade at a DPS school, Bradley Elementary, 30 min. per day is spent on reading. That’s 2 and 1/2 hours per week on reading. TWO HOURS per week is spent teaching Spanish to the English speaking kids.
If this policy is consistent throughout DPS it’s no wonder the kids are lagging behind.
As I’ve said before, wouldn’t it be better to spend the Spanish teacher’s time teaching English to non-English speakers?
Could I please have my tax money back..
Leave A Reply