By Jim Spencer
SpencerSpeaks.com
This column comes with an upfront disclaimer.
I recently lost my job because I had no union protection. Had I been in the bargaining unit, the boss who “involuntarily separated†me from my post could not have laid me off without first canning everyone in my job classification with less seniority.
You know, last hired, first fired.
So take what I say here in that context.
But it needs to be said.
Republicans in the state legislature now slobber over the chance to play the union card against the Democratic governor and Democratic members of the General Assembly.
They warn that talks between union leaders and the governor’s office have set the stage to unionize all state workers.
In
The big lie is this:
If you’re any good at what you do, you won’t need the protection of a collective bargaining agreement.
In an economy driven by bean counters, this will never be true. You fool yourself if you think otherwise. A recent report showed Americans among the most productive workers on earth. That doesn’t stop wholesale layoffs in industries where work can done cheaper in foreign sweatshops.
So when the Republicans invoke the image of greedy “union bosses†running the state and sucking up your hard-earned money in dues payments, take a second to think about the other bosses to whom you inevitably answer.
The anti-labor fear mongers focus on attempts to make it easier to form unions among state employees and other groups of workers. Their underpants are in a wad over the fact that the governor’s people have talked about letting unions meet in state offices.
You wonder who loses if that happens.
The Republicans are hoping it is Democrats.
The GOP has a good strategy, said
“There’s a lot Republican support from the lower middle class workers who are exactly vulnerable to (global) competition,†Zax said. “It’s a huge paradox in American politics.
“When firms suffer, management is less likely to take the hit than workers.â€
The current benefits that most workers, unionized and non-unionized, enjoy owe to the labor movement, Zax continued. But, he said, the labor movement is in some ways “a victim of its own success.â€
These days, if bosses don’t want a union, they don’t hire Pinkertons to bust heads, they provide perks that keep workers from needing to organize.
Don’t write Zax off as a union lackey. He’s anything but. Zax simply states facts. He’s equally ruthless in explaining how today’s global economy works.
“There is no right to a job in the
The same goes for wages, Zax said. “If you’ve got
“If clothing can be made cheaper in
Without union protection there are, Zax pointed out, “lots of stories of pain and anguish. But there is a lot of personal responsibility behind it.â€
The Republican leadership in the legislature couldn’t have said it better.
Their anti-union message presumes several things.
One, we should blame ourselves if we get laid off, because we didn’t deserve the job in the first place. Two, benefits such as health insurance and retirement plans are luxuries to which we are not automatically entitled. And three, employers can be trusted more than union leaders.
In other words, we are entitled only to what our bosses are willing to give, not to what they can afford nor to what we need.
If we buy that argument, then we also buy the fact that the public employees who maintain our roads, teach in our schools and keep the water running and sewers functioning deserve as little as we can possibly pay them.
This is the dog-eat-dog spirit of free enterprise. It is the sense to which the union bashers in the legislature appeal.
In fact, a right-to-work initiative that protects workers against unions may actually get on the November ballot. If it does, it likely will pass. We all want to think that if we’re talented, we not only get to keep our jobs, we get to prosper.
This is the lie we tell ourselves because we so desperately need it to be true. We wallow in the illusion that we control our destinies individually better than any group of workers standing together. We forget that most of what we have came from the collective effort of another generation of workers. We forget that it we do not stand up for each other, our bosses have no reason to do anything for us.
We forget all that until Wall Street demands a bigger profit margin from our industry or the corporation we work for leverages one too many takeovers or an overseas sweatshop offers to do what we do for half the price.
Suddenly, it doesn’t matter how well we did our jobs or how loyal we were to the company. Too late, we see that at some point neither merit nor productivity matter, only money. It is then that we see the truth:
We truly stand alone.
When that happens, the scare tactics of union bashers look as cynical, manipulative and self-serving as anything ever dreamed up by the bogeymen of organized labor.
Copyright 2007 by Jim Spencer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.




17 users commented in " Union Bashers Push Big Lie: Divided We Stand "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackBravisimo, Jim! The wisdom, depth and soulful experience reflected in your words are powerful. May others heed your warning.
You demonstrate integrity with your disclaimer at the beginning of this latest effort, Jim, but you neglect to point out that Post columnists were removed from coverage (and protection) of the contract in negotiations between Post management and the Guild. The columnists pretty much wanted it that way when the deal was done. I wonder if they still do.
On the substance of the column, let’s remember that it’s always about the money. There is little or no principle involved here. The alleged Libertarian-Populists (read that conservative Republicans) in Colorado are only too happy to use the big lie technique to fend off unions. That their fear (hatred) of unions is pathalogical is perhaps subject for another column. On the other hand, it is up to the unions to persuade workers that their lives will be better as a result of union representation, not worse. If they fail to do that, they will continue to shrink in numbers and importance. Meanwhile, jobs that can be sent off-shore to low-wage havens will continue to go. By the way, many Reuters U.S. business stories are arriving with Mumbai datelines, so not even journalists are safe. The phone bill from India to sources in this country isn’t nearly as large as the wage differential.
True Jim! As a young public high school teacher in S.E. Idaho decades ago, I ran into a
similar situation as your’s. Had I been a member of the teacher’s union, I too would have
had some protection. I erroneously listened to
the wrong advice of a significant other who happened to be an independent businessman. He didn’t like unions and didn’t need them…as he was “the employer of others” and didn’t want to ever pay them more than $2 an hour! He was also a staunch Republican! ~ GP
This ought to be required reading for every teen about to start his/her first job … with refresher re-readings with every new job.
To the fellow who said all the Post’s columnists are not in the union: You are wrong. One who loves to bash unions is covered by the collective bargaining agreement.
Jim: Good point. Too bad that didn’t oxcur to you when you came to the Daily Press from Trib and didn’t fight to become a Guild member as a columnist. That might have allowed the unit to remain active.
No, Jimmy. The reason you got FIRED was because you were a liability, not an asset. You were canned because you were and still are a whiny, no-talent candyass who thinks he is owed a job and entitled to a big paycheck. You were let go because you offered nothing of merit or value.
Grow up, Jimmy. Grow up and stop with the whining and moaning. You want to make a living, try working for a living.
It’s too bad when companies are having financial difficulties that they don’t just can the CEO. That should save everybody else’s jobs.
Jim, maybe you got fired because you were paid by the “paragraph” and they needed to cut costs? OK, just kidding, but grow a paragraph for Christ’s sake (notice how I capitalized “Christ” so not to offend the Christian right!).
I think LHKMAN said it best. This is a not a black and white issue; it’s a slippery slope, the phoney Republican/capitalist/libertarian/right wingers want you to believe if you work hard you will succeed! It’s the American dream come true! Anyone can become a millionaire, and then vote to lower taxes on the rich; and all unions are evils, particularly the teacher’s union, because they are keeping public education from going private and allowing rich people to stop paying taxes to pay for expensive teachers to teach poor kids who may learn liberal ideas and become Democrats. OK, I digress.
But on the other hand, unions create almost elitist work environments, where only the senior union members benefit. I worked at John Deeres, in Iowa, where I made good money to buy a house, own a corvette, and live the good life. Since I left, the union beat the company down so much to avoid layoffs, that now the new employee averages just $14/hr while the senior union members retain their lucrative pay. The junior members only dream of reaching that pay grade. Not to mention all the jobs that are being outsourced because of unions. The union is trying to get established in KY Toyota plant, where workers already are making 2.5 times the average state income. Will Toyota move the plant to Mexico? What is a factory work worth?
It’s all one big slippery gray area. While I’ll side with the unions most of the time, they both serve one master. Some middle ground is needed. Yeah, I like choice, and given a new job, I’d like to choose whether I am required to belong to the union or not. But if I produce 200% over my fellow union workers, I’m going to be the first out the door under the union contract, or as well a non-contract. Where do I see job security. Oh, yeah, that’s right I work for the Feds. ;o)
I spent over forty years in the “labor force” with bad union business agents and kingly bosses and finely a state employee. In Colorado, state employees are NOT allowed to have collective barging. So we were left to the whims of the legislators (hows that for security). In my experience, people were let go because they did not like you, not because of you value or productivity. With a union at least you had due process. That’s what I believe most people do not understand. If a worker has due process then the boss has to justify the separation (termination)
to: (dis)honest employee, Bashing a massager is a pretty obvious shot what he has to say rings of truth - liability hell - I canceled the Post after he was fired ( and the fact that another “liability” does not appear anymore in one Mr. John Aloysius Farrell should tell you how the TRUTH from (whiners) is crushed.
Jim, you are correct that some columnists now are covered by the Guild contract. You also know that was a result of subsequent negotiations in which the Guild gave up some things to get columnists the option of being under the contract. I understand the sports columnists remain out of the contract. That a certain columnist who loves to bash unions is protected truly is an irony. It also proves he’s smarter than the average bear. That columnist is a worthy successor to Chuck Green and Al Knight, the former resident right-wingers and troglodytes at the Post.
The person who signs him/herself “honest employee” reveals by his/her mean-spirited comments about Jim and his work that he/she never has belonged to a union. May he/she never have to lose his/her employment because the employer must cut costs. And, may he/she never lose his/her employment just because an employer decides he/she doesn’t like the way “honest employee” speaks, or smiles, or walks, or dresses, or any of the other reasons that are legal grounds for termination in an at-will state such as Colorado. In short, “honest employee” would be well advised to learn something about labor and labor-relations before posting mean-spirited comments.
This is what I read in the blog:
“One, we should blame ourselves if we get laid off, because we didn’t deserve the job in the first place. Two, benefits such as health insurance and retirement plans are luxuries to which we are not automatically entitled. And three, employers can be trusted more than union leaders.
In other words, we are entitled only to what our bosses are willing to give, not to what they can afford nor to what we need.”
I’m sorry dudes and dudesses, I’ve owned four businesses and I’ve been a job steward at CWA, Communications Workers of America.
That’s my brief background, not including a degree in Computer Technology and currently work as a Programmer/Business Analyst for a multinational corporation. (the dark side)
The issue is what Unions used to do and what they currently do. Retirement plans, partial payment of health insurance and other such stuff are not “entitlements” or “rights”.
Our founders would turn in their graves at such a thought. Yes,Republicans tend to over simplify as do the Democrats.
Here is a good difference between the two:
“Fred Thompson and Hillary Clinton were walking down the street when
they came to a homeless person.
The Republican, Fred Thompson, gave the homeless person his business
card and told him to come to his office for a job. He then took $20
out of his pocket and gave it to the homeless person.
Hillary was very impressed, so when they came to another homeless
person, she decided to help. She walked over to the homeless person
and gave him directions to the welfare office. She then reached into
Thompson’s pocket and got out $20. She kept $15 for her administrative
fees and gave the homeless person $5.
Now, do you understand the difference?”
The union apologists are much like this example of Hillary..the Union “bashers” are much like the example of Thompson and both make the same mistake.
When I owned my businesses I made it a habit of offering jobs to the “homeless”. Out of several hundred business cards handed out within a block my office, one person showed. The rest obviously took the money and used it for immediate pleasure, be it a meal or drugs (booze).
So the Thompson character shows the flaw of giving the money and offering a job (naivity), the Hillary character is the typical Government can and should solve all things, and take money from those who produce without their choice, keep a horrendous admin fee (ever check the GAO for those stats)and give the “crumbs” to the poor…
Both are weak.
As the old saying goes, “I’d rather teach a man to fish and have a friend for life, than cook him a fish and have a friend for a meal.”
That platitude says it all, but it assumes that one wants to learn how to fish, what if they don’t?
Unions have misused the power they had gained. They sank from employee rights, to employee benefits (claiming them as rights) and why not? The Democratic Party’s socialist camp has professed as much. It is even repeated here as if it were fact….
Reform is needed in the Union movement as well as in our government and tax code.
I never hear these same people that are complaining about the unfairness of layoffs and the “safety” of being in a union, mention a word about the dry wallers, masons, carpenters and landscapers being laid off by illegal alien “cheap” labor. They never bemoan those layoffs and champion a union attempting to protect the American worker.. funny how we pick and choose our rights and wrongs even if they are from the same “family”…
May God Bless,
Father O’Malley
Jim,
Coming off as if you support union labor is a joke. You don’t even want companies to identify whether or not a person is a legal citizen when applying for employment….
Think about your contradiction………
Just like all the rest..
John
Refer back to your new regulations, same old predjudice column and think about your contradictory manner… Unions are all about regulations. So what do you support and who are the bigots here?… George Bush (who you want to be a bigot) who wants to allow Mexican truckers or you (who would never be a bigot) that wants Mexican roofers that don’t unionize…where do you really stand Jim?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Nowhere man please listen, you don’t know what you’re missin….nowhere man, the world is at your command..doesn’t have a point of view…….
any where?
By the way I was a Teamster for 3 years and am totally disenchanted by the union lifestyle..It protects laziness and lack of work ethic… There is no doubt about this. I cut steel for a living and was a young fit intelligent man that had good math skills. I could cut steel without a partner (my partner was on leave due to obesity) than my “competing” sheer by 4 to 1..Meaning I cut 4 times as much steel alone as the 2 guys manning their sheer. I ended up getting assaulted by those guys, getting moved off my sheer and into the warehouse.. No doubt about it, Teamsters protect laziness………I lived it and I learned it. Not sure if you know what a sheer is or how steel gets cut, but hope you get the point.
I’m a Republican who thinks unions are obsolete and inneficient. However I am voting for Duncan Hunter, and I will never cast another vote for another free-traitor globalist. If I have to go 3rd party I will. The US is approaching a 1 trillion dollar a year trade deficit. Absolutely unsustainable. You Communist China lovers can go shove it.
Leave A Reply