Comments on: Gambling Money Comes Back in Plain White Wrapper http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/ Here are my thoughts; share yours Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:07:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 By: no idea http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-260 no idea Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:42:36 +0000 http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-260 jim, Lamborne is obviously nuts... But do you really care if he received a contribution from a gambling company? or if other right wing nuts want to frame him for being nuts? The weird thing here is the cover up of a $1000 check..no doubt.. Hillary is going down the same road that her husband and Al Gore went down with Charlie Trie and the Chinese fundraising scandal... Yes Lamborne is an unsavory character, but why don't you care about the big picture..it's not in your DNA? jim,

Lamborne is obviously nuts… But do you really care if he received a contribution from a gambling company? or if other right wing nuts want to frame him for being nuts? The weird thing here is the cover up of a $1000 check..no doubt..

Hillary is going down the same road that her husband and Al Gore went down with Charlie Trie and the Chinese fundraising scandal…

Yes Lamborne is an unsavory character, but why don’t you care about the big picture..it’s not in your DNA?

]]> By: no idea http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-261 no idea Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:50:34 +0000 http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-261 Rather than "Gambling money ($1000) comes in plain white wrapper"> How about Chinese money comes in U.S. Dollars, but this doesn't offend you... Rather than “Gambling money ($1000) comes in plain white wrapper”> How about Chinese money comes in U.S. Dollars, but this doesn’t offend you…

]]> By: Wildflower http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-262 Wildflower Wed, 05 Sep 2007 03:02:35 +0000 http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-262 "Be sure your sin will find you out." It's all about GOP hypocrisy. How they do squirm when they get caught with the proverbial hand in the cookie jar (or under the toilet stall).. “Be sure your sin will find you out.” It’s all about GOP hypocrisy. How they do squirm when they get caught with the proverbial hand in the cookie jar (or under the toilet stall)..

]]> By: clj http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-263 clj Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:27:54 +0000 http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-263 The comments so seem to defend the concribution. Why is it that when someting unsavory happens to the right wing its either to ignor it or the big excuse "Clinton Did It" The comments so seem to defend the concribution. Why is it that when someting unsavory happens to the right wing its either to ignor it or the big excuse “Clinton Did It”

]]> By: no idea http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-265 no idea Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:08:50 +0000 http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-265 it's not about "Clinton did it". It's about Jim making a 'mountain out of a mole hill' and not giving a rat's you know what about big picture. If a Republican slips up, and I am not defender of Lamborne (in fact I think he's a freak), Jim is all over them. I have never seen him once criticize a Democrat no matter the level of scoundrel that they may be. Hillary has been taking dirty money through straw donors similar to her husband and Al Gore. This is a much bigger story than an attack (which is what Jim takes pleasure in) on the religious right. I was pointing out how mediocre that his outrage is and how short sided that he oftentimes seems to be. Although I cruise the site for a reason and enjoy reading his opinions. it’s not about “Clinton did it”. It’s about Jim making a ‘mountain out of a mole hill’ and not giving a rat’s you know what about big picture. If a Republican slips up, and I am not defender of Lamborne (in fact I think he’s a freak), Jim is all over them. I have never seen him once criticize a Democrat no matter the level of scoundrel that they may be. Hillary has been taking dirty money through straw donors similar to her husband and Al Gore. This is a much bigger story than an attack (which is what Jim takes pleasure in) on the religious right. I was pointing out how mediocre that his outrage is and how short sided that he oftentimes seems to be. Although I cruise the site for a reason and enjoy reading his opinions.

]]> By: Wildflower http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-266 Wildflower Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:02:19 +0000 http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-266 If memory serves me correctly, Goliath was slain one stone at a time. Go David! If memory serves me correctly, Goliath was slain one stone at a time. Go David!

]]> By: no idea http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-268 no idea Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:02:36 +0000 http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-268 But who is the David????? Wildflower, don't you care either? But who is the David????? Wildflower, don’t you care either?

]]> By: no idea http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-269 no idea Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:13:09 +0000 http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-269 Think about it...Somebody claiming that they didn't receive a LEGAL donation for $1500 (as unsavory a character that Lamborne may be) or receiving multi millions of dollars over a 15 year period from a foreign government through straw donors...... Because there is big D by the name, you don't care and Jim doesn't for that matter or he would write about it. because it's all about ideology.........The fruit is rotten from all sides and I am here to tell you about it. Think about it…Somebody claiming that they didn’t receive a LEGAL donation for $1500 (as unsavory a character that Lamborne may be) or receiving multi millions of dollars over a 15 year period from a foreign government through straw donors…… Because there is big D by the name, you don’t care and Jim doesn’t for that matter or he would write about it. because it’s all about ideology………The fruit is rotten from all sides and I am here to tell you about it.

]]> By: Lamborn's chickens come home to roost http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-272 Lamborn's chickens come home to roost Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:07:13 +0000 http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-272 Below is the first of a four part series that has links to the remaing parts that discusses other problems with Lamborn's past, including his voting on a law limiting parental responsbility in Colorado for crimes and torts committed by their minor children. Lamborn's minor son was an arsonist. He caused approximately $130,000 in damages. Lamborn was found liable by the court to pay $3,000 and Lamborn tried to avoid payment, and was hauled before the court and forced to pay. Lamborn didn't disclose to the Colorado state legislature while he was voting on the bill that involved parents obligations for damages caused by their minor children that he was himself the subject of a court order to make restitution. He said later he was not required to do so because the bill he was voting on didn't affect the past crimes his son had committed as an arsonist--but, it did, however, affect Lamborn's parental responsibility on any future crimes his son committed while a minor. If his son did commit any more arsons, that's unknown. Lamborn learned his lesson the first time to pay up instead of getting sued by an arson victim who demanded payment Lamborn didn't want to pay. http://www.coloradopols.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3140 Below is the first of a four part series that has links to the remaing parts that discusses other problems with Lamborn’s past, including his voting on a law limiting parental responsbility in Colorado for crimes and torts committed by their minor children. Lamborn’s minor son was an arsonist. He caused approximately $130,000 in damages. Lamborn was found liable by the court to pay $3,000 and Lamborn tried to avoid payment, and was hauled before the court and forced to pay. Lamborn didn’t disclose to the Colorado state legislature while he was voting on the bill that involved parents obligations for damages caused by their minor children that he was himself the subject of a court order to make restitution. He said later he was not required to do so because the bill he was voting on didn’t affect the past crimes his son had committed as an arsonist–but, it did, however, affect Lamborn’s parental responsibility on any future crimes his son committed while a minor. If his son did commit any more arsons, that’s unknown. Lamborn learned his lesson the first time to pay up instead of getting sued by an arson victim who demanded payment Lamborn didn’t want to pay.

http://www.coloradopols.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3140

]]> By: no idea http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-276 no idea Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:45:51 +0000 http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/09/04/gambling-money-comes-back-in-plain-white-wrapper/#comment-276 I am no fan of Lamborn, yet even Jim would be opposed to treaing his son as an adult. I am no fan of Lamborn, yet even Jim would be opposed to treaing his son as an adult.

]]>