<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intrepid Columnist Tests Craig&#8217;s &#8220;Wide Stance&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/</link>
	<description>Here are my thoughts; share yours</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Joeyh21</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-241</link>
		<author>Joeyh21</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-241</guid>
					<description>HAHA!!!!!

Fantastic piece!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHA!!!!!</p>
<p>Fantastic piece!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob "Knucklehead" Ehlert</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-242</link>
		<author>Bob "Knucklehead" Ehlert</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-242</guid>
					<description>Back in the day, Jimbo, when you taught me how to roll up the sleeves of my shirt to the inside, you never discussed the proper stance of thundercloset protocol.

And, for both of these, I am eternally grateful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the day, Jimbo, when you taught me how to roll up the sleeves of my shirt to the inside, you never discussed the proper stance of thundercloset protocol.</p>
<p>And, for both of these, I am eternally grateful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: durf786</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-243</link>
		<author>durf786</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-243</guid>
					<description>A worthy experiment! We owe you one! LMAO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A worthy experiment! We owe you one! LMAO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LHKMAN</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-245</link>
		<author>LHKMAN</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-245</guid>
					<description>Very good!  This whole tawdry affair needs a bit of humor.  Have you ever noted the irony that the most "holier than though" invariably are the one's who are revealed as the biggest hypocrites?  When you combine this week's story with the information that there have been rumors about Craig's secuality for the past 25 years, it is hard to accept his protestations of innocence.  Go ahead, Senator, be gay.  It's alright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good!  This whole tawdry affair needs a bit of humor.  Have you ever noted the irony that the most &#8220;holier than though&#8221; invariably are the one&#8217;s who are revealed as the biggest hypocrites?  When you combine this week&#8217;s story with the information that there have been rumors about Craig&#8217;s secuality for the past 25 years, it is hard to accept his protestations of innocence.  Go ahead, Senator, be gay.  It&#8217;s alright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Scanlon</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-246</link>
		<author>Terry Scanlon</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-246</guid>
					<description>Great investigative work. But there's more to be done. Help me undstand the whole swiping-the-hend-under-the-stall thing. Go back to the library and extend your hand to the guy in the stall next to you. Let me know how that goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great investigative work. But there&#8217;s more to be done. Help me undstand the whole swiping-the-hend-under-the-stall thing. Go back to the library and extend your hand to the guy in the stall next to you. Let me know how that goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RudyG</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-248</link>
		<author>RudyG</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-248</guid>
					<description>Love it!
I was wondering some of the same things, but you took it further, tho not into the next stall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it!<br />
I was wondering some of the same things, but you took it further, tho not into the next stall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RikWeles</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-249</link>
		<author>RikWeles</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-249</guid>
					<description>Thanks for "assuming the position," Jimbo -- you have proved that Larry's stall tale is a tall tale, in more ways than one ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for &#8220;assuming the position,&#8221; Jimbo &#8212; you have proved that Larry&#8217;s stall tale is a tall tale, in more ways than one &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-250</link>
		<author>Keith</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-250</guid>
					<description>I'm waiting for internet photos of guys sitting in this very toilet stall trying a "wide stance."  They're going to milk this to the hilt.  These guys just set themselves up for not only columnists and comedians, but even Repubs who are saying, "what was he thinking?!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for internet photos of guys sitting in this very toilet stall trying a &#8220;wide stance.&#8221;  They&#8217;re going to milk this to the hilt.  These guys just set themselves up for not only columnists and comedians, but even Repubs who are saying, &#8220;what was he thinking?!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-253</link>
		<author>Sasha</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-253</guid>
					<description>I loved this piece.  I needed a good laugh after the day I've had and you provided it.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved this piece.  I needed a good laugh after the day I&#8217;ve had and you provided it.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuckdaplumber</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-274</link>
		<author>chuckdaplumber</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-274</guid>
					<description>The only danger I have ever been aware of while using a public toilet is watching out for someone reaching under the stall and stealing my billfold, imagine trying to chase a thief with your pants around your ankles.
I have a question: if Craig pleaded down to bad conduct, What was the real offense?
Masturbating in a public place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only danger I have ever been aware of while using a public toilet is watching out for someone reaching under the stall and stealing my billfold, imagine trying to chase a thief with your pants around your ankles.<br />
I have a question: if Craig pleaded down to bad conduct, What was the real offense?<br />
Masturbating in a public place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Simon</title>
		<link>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-394</link>
		<author>John Simon</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spencerspeaks.com/2007/08/30/intrepid-columnist-tests-craigs-wide-stance/#comment-394</guid>
					<description>So you travel to MSP to get "evidence".  How about before you jump to conclusions, you check some other evidence.

People are assuming intent on Craig's part because they put stock in rumors which the 
Idaho Statesman spent 10 months investigating.

The result?  One unnamed, admitted by the paper as unreliable, "witness" who believes he did something with Senator Craig sometime in 2004.

Further, in the last 3 weeks of crazy media frenzy not one man has come forward with any claim to have had sex with this man.  The absence of proof in this case is deafening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you travel to MSP to get &#8220;evidence&#8221;.  How about before you jump to conclusions, you check some other evidence.</p>
<p>People are assuming intent on Craig&#8217;s part because they put stock in rumors which the<br />
Idaho Statesman spent 10 months investigating.</p>
<p>The result?  One unnamed, admitted by the paper as unreliable, &#8220;witness&#8221; who believes he did something with Senator Craig sometime in 2004.</p>
<p>Further, in the last 3 weeks of crazy media frenzy not one man has come forward with any claim to have had sex with this man.  The absence of proof in this case is deafening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
